Prediction of Lloyd Bourne vs Mark Edmondson Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Bourne vs M. Edmondson

Lloyd Bourne

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mark Edmondson

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Bourne 1 - 0 Edmondson

They have played 3 sets in total, with Lloyd Bourne winning 3 and Mark Edmondson winning 0. The last match between Lloyd Bourne and Mark Edmondson was at the Australian Open, 25-11-1985, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Lloyd Bourne getting the victory 6-1 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bourne	1
Edmondson	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Australian Open(11-25-85)

Stats

Lloyd Bourne

Mark Edmondson

L. Bourne vs M. Edmondson H2H Profile

L. Bourne	Stats	M. Edmondson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
45.87% (100-118)	Career Total W/L	51.57% (263-247)
1	Grass	0
0	Titles	6
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Bourne vs M. Edmondson Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lloyd Bourne has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mark Edmondson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lloyd Bourne, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mark Edmondson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Lloyd Bourne has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mark Edmondson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Lloyd Bourne has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mark Edmondson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Lloyd Bourne has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 30/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 13/20). Mark Edmondson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 111/63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 64/81).
Player level: In the last year, Lloyd Bourne has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mark Edmondson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lloyd Bourne winning 1 times and Mark Edmondson being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lloyd Bourne winning 3 and Mark Edmondson winning 0.
The last match between Lloyd Bourne and Mark Edmondson was at the Australian Open, 25-11-1985, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Lloyd Bourne getting the victory 6-1 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lloyd Bourne has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mark Edmondson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lloyd Bourne has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mark Edmondson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Lloyd Bourne has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mark Edmondson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Lloyd Bourne vs Mark Edmondson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Bourne vs M. Edmondson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Bourne	Stats	M. Edmondson
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	0
19	Games Won	9
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Bourne Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven CH - 15-08-1988
R4 Brian GarrowB. Garrow	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
R3 Nuno MarquesN. Marques	W	7-6 6-4	Stats
Valkenswaard CH - 18-11-1987
R3 Tony MmohT. Mmoh	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R4 Andrei OlhovskiyA. Olhovskiy	W	6-3 1-6 7-6	Stats
QF Petr KordaP. Korda	L	6-4 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Edmondson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 12-01-1987
R2 Nick FulwoodN. Fulwood	W	6-4 4-6 4-6 7-5 9-7	Stats
R3 Tim WilkisonT. Wilkison	L	6-2 6-1 7-6	Stats
Sydney Indoor - 13-10-1986
R3 Peter DoohanP. Doohan	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
R4 Marcel FreemanM. Freeman	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Montreal / Toronto - 11-08-1986
R2 Slobodan ZivojinovicS. Zivojinovic	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

L. Bourne vs M. Edmondson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Bourne	Stats	M. Edmondson
45.87% (100/118)	YTD Win/Loss	51.59% (260/244)
46.01% (254/298)	Sets Win/Loss	51.37% (673/637)
48.32% (2595/2776)	Games Win/Loss	50.25% (6306/6243)
46.08% (47/55)	Hard Win/Loss	46.30% (50/58)
39.39% (13/20)	Clay Win/Loss	44.14% (64/81)
37.04% (10/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.45% (35/42)
53.57% (30/26)	Grass Win/Loss	63.79% (111/63)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
554.64	Average Opponent Rank	589.89
39.29% (11/17)	Slam W/L	53.66% (44/38)
40.00% (4/6)	Masters W/L	33.33% (8/16)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	61.11% (11/7)
43.80% (53/68)	Main Tour W/L	51.72% (195/182)
54.24% (32/27)	Challenger W/L	66.67% (2/1)
47% (88/188)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (204/406)
36% (10/28)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	57% (54/95)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (1/2)
49% (36/74)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (83/161)
83% (101/84)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (248/206)
17% (101/17)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (248/42)
12% (115/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (254/52)