Lisa Zaar vs Yasmine Kabbaj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 10:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Zaar vs Y. Kabbaj

SWE
2
Win
Played
0
Win

MAR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zaar 2 - 0 Kabbaj
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lisa Zaar winning 4 and Yasmine Kabbaj winning 1. The last match between Lisa Zaar and Yasmine Kabbaj was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Lisa Zaar getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Zaar | 2 |
Kabbaj | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-16-25)
(Q3) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-01-24)
L. Zaar vs Y. Kabbaj H2H Profile
L. Zaar vs Y. Kabbaj Match Preview:
- Yasmine Kabbaj’s second serve point win rate over the last six months is 34.50%, slightly lower than Lisa Zaar’s at 36.96%. Who might benefit from a stronger second serve? Lisa Zaar, marginally.
- Regarding return game stats, Kabbaj wins 55.24% of opponent second serve points, just ahead of Zaar's 54.43%. In first serve returns, Zaar has an edge with 39.22% compared to Kabbaj's 38.00%.
- Kabbaj has saved 46.39% of breakpoints recently, while Zaar saves 48.54%, indicating she may handle pressure slightly better.
- In the past year, Kabbaj has a higher win percentage (71.23%) compared to Zaar's (57.97%), indicating overall stronger performance.
- Kabbaj thrives on clay (69% career win), whereas Zaar performs best on indoor hard courts (69% career win). Could surface type be a decisive factor?
- Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Kabbaj winning 68.89% and Zaar 57.38% of these matches.
- Their direct head-to-head record shows Zaar leading with one win to Kabbaj’s zero, though matches have been closely contested in terms of sets.
- In deciding set situations, Kabbaj shows strength, winning 67% of such sets, compared to Zaar's 57% in the past year.
- The quality of their opponents is almost identical, with Kabbaj facing slightly higher-ranked players on average.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance statistics, Lisa Zaar exhibits a slight advantage in second serve points and breakpoint saving capabilities. This edge in critical moments suggests she could capitalize under pressure situations during the match.
While Yasmine Kabbaj boasts a higher overall win percentage and better performance in deciding sets, her recent second serve performance lags slightly behind, and her history against Zaar remains unfavorably tilted.
Given that past matchups have been closely contested, the surface could play a role. Kabbaj’s clay court preference might give her some leverage, but Zaar’s recent victory on clay suggests she can handle Yasmine’s forte.
Considering all these factors, Lisa Zaar appears marginally more likely to secure victory in the forthcoming matchup. However, with both players' statistics being closely aligned, a competitive encounter is anticipated.
Lisa Zaar vs Yasmine Kabbaj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Zaar vs Y. Kabbaj H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
32 | Games Won | 21 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:55:44 | Average Match Time | 1:55:44 |
81% (99/122) | 1st Serve % | 79% (94/119) |
56% (55/99) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (40/94) |
39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (9/25) |
75% (12/16) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (7/17) |
59% (70/119) | Return Points Win % | 48% (58/122) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Zaar Recent Matches Played
Y. Kabbaj Recent Matches Played

L. Zaar vs Y. Kabbaj Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.16% (114/82) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.15% (102/57) |
56.67% (255/195) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.61% (217/141) |
53.32% (2198/1924) | Games Win/Loss | 55.60% (1747/1395) |
58.93% (33/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 38.10% (8/13) |
57.66% (64/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.38% (93/43) |
58.62% (17/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
29 | Aces Total | 45 |
0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
732 | Total Double Faults | 557 |
1:41:8 | Average Match Time | 1:33:4 |
438.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 435.25 |
73% (8434/11600) | 1st Serve % | 74% (6865/9235) |
56% (4760/8434) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (3919/6865) |
42% (1318/3166) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (976/2370) |
51% (855/1672) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (677/1307) |
51% (5833/11546) | Return Points Win % | 50% (4515/8978) |
0.00% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
55.38% (72/58) | Challenger W/L | 60.82% (59/38) |
66.67% (42/21) | Futures W/L | 75.44% (43/14) |
59% (113/193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (97/153) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
55% (27/49) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (15/23) |
56% (34/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (26/42) |
88% (114/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (96/87) |
11% (114/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (96/9) |
17% (82/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (63/13) |