Lisa Zaar vs Jenny Lim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jul at 10:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Zaar vs J. Lim

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 0 Lim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lisa Zaar winning 2 and Jenny Lim winning 0. The last match between Lisa Zaar and Jenny Lim was at the W35 Torino, 16-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Lisa Zaar getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zaar | 1 |
| Lim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Torino(07-16-25)
L. Zaar vs J. Lim H2H Profile
L. Zaar vs J. Lim Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Lim has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 40.29% of points compared to Zaar's 37.52%. Could this give Lim the upper hand?
- Zaar excels in return game stats, capturing 54.2% of opponent's second serve points, outpacing Lim who takes 48.01% of these points. Does this indicate a stronger return game for Zaar?
- When facing first serve returns, Zaar wins 39.26% of points compared to Lim's 35.23%, suggesting a stronger defense against first serves for Zaar.
- Under pressure, Lim has a slight edge, saving 50.38% of breakpoints compared to Zaar's 47.12%, potentially making Lim more resilient in critical moments.
- In terms of overall performance, Zaar has a higher match win rate at 58.82% over the past year, while Lim's is 53.97%. Could Zaar's recent match experience tip the scales in their favor?
- Zaar's best performing surface is I.hard with a 59% win rate, while Lim excels on Hard courts with a 71% success rate, suggesting their comfort zones differ.
- Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF events, with Zaar winning 57.69% and Lim 54.55% of these matches, implying similar competitive levels.
- The quality of opponents faced slightly favors Lim, who played against players averaging a rank of 367.76 compared to Zaar's 401.9, indicating Lim might be used to tougher competition.
- Deciding set outcomes are stronger for Lim, who wins 70% of these sets, as opposed to Zaar's 56%, suggesting Lim has the edge if the match is closely contested.
- In recent form, Zaar has been more effective at capitalizing on breakpoints, converting 43.16% versus Lim's 37.35%, offering Zaar a potential advantage in crucial game-turning moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match showcases two players with distinct strengths and areas of expertise on the court. Zaar's strong return game and higher breakpoint conversion make them a formidable opponent, particularly when it comes to neutralizing their opponent's serve.
Lim, on the other hand, boasts a better second serve performance and has shown greater resilience under pressure, with a notable ability to emerge victorious in deciding sets. Additionally, Lim's experience against higher-ranked opponents could provide a tactical edge.
Taking into account these comparative strengths and weaknesses, Lim appears to have a slight advantage going into this match, primarily due to their resilience in critical points and higher-level match experiences. Based on these analyses, Lim is the most likely candidate to win this encounter.
Lisa Zaar vs Jenny Lim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Zaar vs J. Lim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 69% (46/67) | 1st Serve % | 53% (26/49) |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 55% (27/49) | Return Points Win % | 40% (27/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Zaar Recent Matches Played
J. Lim Recent Matches Played

L. Zaar vs J. Lim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.29% (116/83) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.44% (101/88) |
| 56.55% (259/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.69% (225/202) |
| 53.31% (2237/1959) | Games Win/Loss | 51.45% (2009/1896) |
| 58.93% (33/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.81% (37/16) |
| 57.89% (66/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.52% (49/48) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.46% (15/24) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 29 | Aces Total | 177 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 740 | Total Double Faults | 544 |
| 1:41:15 | Average Match Time | 1:31:17 |
| 207.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.02 |
| 73% (8603/11815) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7403/11471) |
| 56% (4843/8603) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4377/7403) |
| 42% (1341/3212) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1802/4068) |
| 51% (873/1705) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (688/1407) |
| 51% (5933/11741) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5125/11063) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.64% (74/59) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (63/63) |
| 66.67% (42/21) | Futures W/L | 62.30% (38/23) |
| 59% (115/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (101/186) |
| 54% (27/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (23/46) |
| 57% (36/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (29/52) |
| 88% (114/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (96/85) |
| 11% (114/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (96/11) |
| 19% (85/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (93/16) |