Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zaar vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zaar has won 42.02% of points on his second serve, while Hennemann has won 45.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zaar, in recent form, has won 56.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 52.5% and 45.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zaar has saved 52.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 50.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zaar has won 50% of matches played (W/L 13/ 13), with Hennemann winning 63.49% (W/L 40/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Zaar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zaar winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zaar winning 2 and Hennemann winning 0. The last match between Zaar and Hennemann was at the W25 Danderyd, 10-08-2022, First, Clay with Lisa Zaar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zaar and Hennemann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zaar winning 0 times and Hennemann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zaar winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zaar has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.5 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 270.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zaar has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zaar has converted 58.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 48.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 0 Hennemann
777
Rank
498
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
444
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
55% (48-40)
Career Total W/L
62% (154-96)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
74% (20-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lisa Zaar | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (40/54) | 63% (39/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (25/40) | 46% (18/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 39% (9/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (35/62) | 41% (22/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Lisa Zaar
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lisa Zaar | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 74% (20/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 73% (43/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (13/16) | 57% (318/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.5 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:41:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 282.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (65/91) | 69% (1096/1588) |
| 1st Serve W% | 48% (31/65) | 62% (681/1096) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (12/26) | 45% (219/492) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (7/13) | 50% (124/250) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (37/80) | 51% (786/1553) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (12/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 74% (20/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Lisa Zaar
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asylzhan Arystanbekova
Player
Lisa Zaar
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valerija Maija Kargina
Player
Lisa Zaar
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Anastasia Mozgaleva
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Natalija Senic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Tatyana Nikolenko
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Timea Jaruskova
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Iulia Andreea Ionescu
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Lisa Zaar
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Iva Primorac
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Anastasia Iamachkine
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
87%
(
34 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zaar Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
