Lisa Pigato vs Lisa Zaar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 12:27 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Pigato vs L. Zaar

ITA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

SWE
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Pigato 0 - 1 Zaar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lisa Pigato winning 1 and Lisa Zaar winning 1. The last match between Lisa Zaar and Lisa Pigato was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-5 0-1 ret..
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Pigato | 0 |
Zaar | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-14-25)
L. Pigato vs L. Zaar H2H Profile
L. Pigato vs L. Zaar Match Preview:
- Second serve performance over the last six months shows a very close comparison: Lisa Pigato has achieved a 36.80% win rate on her second serve points, closely matched by Lisa Zaar at 36.76%. Could this minimal difference indicate a level playing field on second serves? Yes, though subtle, this may not be a major differentiator.
- When it comes to return game statistics, Lisa Zaar has a slight upper hand. She has won 55.04% of her opponents' second serve points in recent months compared to Lisa Pigato's 52.19%. In first serve return points, Lisa Zaar also leads with 39.09% against 34.57% for Lisa Pigato. Can this return prowess influence the match outcome? Certainly, it's a key advantage for Zaar.
- Analyzing their performance under pressure, Lisa Zaar shows resilience by saving 48.71% of breakpoints, surpassing Lisa Pigato's 45.43%. Such mental toughness could be pivotal in tight situations.
- Overall performance over the past year favors Lisa Pigato, with a higher match win rate of 69.35% compared to 58.57% for Lisa Zaar. Does this consistency suggest she could be favored in this matchup? It's a likely indicator of superior form.
- Comparing surface preferences, both players excel on hard surfaces with a win rate of 61%. This similarity may imply no clear edge on the surface preference front.
- In terms of the level of play, both have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF events over $10K, with Pigato winning 69.09% of these matches compared to Zaar's 58.06%. Does event experience matter in predictions? Yes, Pigato's stronger performance at this level suggests an edge.
- Considering the quality of opponents, Lisa Pigato has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 345.27, compared to Lisa Zaar's 420.73. Facing higher-ranked players could better prepare Pigato for challenging matches.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Lisa Pigato has the advantage, winning 71% of such sets in the past 12 months, whereas Lisa Zaar has won 57%. This indicates that Pigato might be the more clutch player.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
Today's matchup presents an intriguing contest between Lisa Pigato and Lisa Zaar, with both players displaying strengths in different areas.
While their second serve stats are evenly matched, Lisa Zaar has a slight advantage in return games, showcasing stronger figures for both first and second serve returns. This could give her an edge in breaking her opponent's serve.
However, Lisa Pigato has been more successful under pressure in recent months and boasts a higher overall win rate, potentially pointing to a more consistent performance level.
Both players excel on hard surfaces, so neither is expected to have a distinct advantage based on the playing surface.
Ultimately, considering Pigato's greater success at the Challenger/ITF level and her experience against higher-ranked opponents, she appears more poised to claim victory. Additionally, her superior track record in deciding sets further bolsters her chance to win this match.
Based on these observations, Lisa Pigato is most likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis showdown.
Lisa Pigato vs Lisa Zaar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Pigato vs L. Zaar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | Sets Won | 1 |
6 | Games Won | 7 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:17:24 | Average Match Time | 1:17:24 |
58% (25/43) | 1st Serve % | 79% (23/29) |
44% (11/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (4/6) |
75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
41% (12/29) | Return Points Win % | 53% (23/43) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Pigato Recent Matches Played
L. Zaar Recent Matches Played

L. Pigato vs L. Zaar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.33% (182/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.46% (114/81) |
56.13% (403/315) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.92% (255/193) |
53.61% (3514/3041) | Games Win/Loss | 53.40% (2190/1911) |
61.11% (22/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.93% (33/23) |
59.32% (140/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.18% (64/46) |
51.35% (19/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.62% (17/12) |
33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
133 | Aces Total | 29 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
941 | Total Double Faults | 732 |
1:37:24 | Average Match Time | 1:41:1 |
464.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.15 |
69% (12984/18723) | 1st Serve % | 73% (8379/11538) |
58% (7543/12984) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4737/8379) |
45% (2574/5738) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1315/3159) |
50% (1288/2553) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (850/1656) |
48% (8983/18578) | Return Points Win % | 51% (5788/11455) |
25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
33.33% (2/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
54.98% (127/104) | Challenger W/L | 55.81% (72/57) |
73.24% (52/19) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (42/21) |
59% (179/304) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (113/192) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
37% (19/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (27/49) |
59% (58/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (34/61) |
87% (169/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (114/100) |
13% (169/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (114/13) |
23% (143/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (81/14) |