Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lindsay Davenport vs Amanda Coetzer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Davenport vs Coetzer analysis and find out who is favored!
Lindsay Davenport vs Amanda Coetzer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Davenport has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Coetzer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Davenport, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coetzer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Davenport has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coetzer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Davenport has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Coetzer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Davenport has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 85% (W/L 63/ 11), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 72% (W/L 34/ 13). Coetzer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 196/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 16 times before with Davenport winning 13 times. They have played 36 sets in total, with Davenport winning 28 and Coetzer winning 8. The last match between Davenport and Coetzer was at the JP Morgan Chase Open - Los Angeles, California, 08-08-2003, Quarterfinals, Hard with Lindsay Davenport getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Davenport and Coetzer have played a deciding set 4 times, with Davenport winning 2 times and Coetzer 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Davenport winning 0, and Coetzer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Davenport has played against opponents with an average rank of while Coetzer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Davenport has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coetzer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Davenport has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coetzer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Davenport 13 - 3 Coetzer
Ret.
Rank
1
High
47
Age
R
Plays
13
Total3
6
Hard2
1
Clay0
6
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
12
High
52
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
79% (755-197)
Career Total W/L
63% (576-340)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,869,625
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lindsay Davenport | Amanda Coetzer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 13 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 28 | 8 |
| Games Won | 195 | 124 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 81% (13/16) | 19% (3/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 1-6 6-1 | |||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
| 6-0 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lindsay Davenport | Amanda Coetzer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lindsay Davenport Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats 
Marion Bartoli
Player
Lindsay Davenport
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Alisa Kleybanova
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Aleksandra Wozniak
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Renata Voracova
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Karolina Sprem
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
10
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Jill Craybas
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lindsay Davenport
Player
Vania King
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Coetzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinara Safina
Player
Amanda Coetzer
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Coetzer
Player
Tara Snyder
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Amanda Coetzer
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Coetzer
Player
Barbara Schett
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Davenport Vs Coetzer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
