L. Noskova
To Win
M. L. Carle
To Win
Linda Noskova vs Rebeka Masarova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L W L W L
Form
L W W W L W L W W WHead To Head: Noskova 0 - 0 Masarova
| Noskova | Stats | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (11-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (14-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 31 | Ranking | 153 |
| 25 | Highest Rank | 62 |
| 20 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 65% (158-84) | Career Total W/L | 63% (245-145) |
| $2,058,192 | Career Prize Money | $890,343 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Bernarda Pera
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Linda Noskova
111%
(
70 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
124%
(
61 of
49)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Linda Noskova
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Linda Noskova
41%
(
23 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Linda Noskova
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jessica Pegula
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Diana Shnaider
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
16
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(8) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Yulia Putintseva
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Rebeka Masarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sara Bejlek
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
82%
(
79 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Arantxa Rus
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Rebeka Masarova
61%
(
85 of
139)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
2
Aces
7
15
Double Faults
8
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
56 of
75)
39%
(
21 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
60 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
149)
147
Total Points Won
141
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Shuai Zhang
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
100%
(
15 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
2 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Rebeka Masarova
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Bernarda Pera
55%
(
55 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
13
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
5
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Rebeka Masarova
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (158/84) | Win/Loss | 63% (245/145) |
| 62% (349/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (550/362) |
| 53% (2865/2497) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4573/3873) |
| 66% (73/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (82/48) |
| 60% (37/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (136/69) |
| 75% (44/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (22/20) |
| 40% (4/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 893 | Aces Total | 1300 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 991 | Total Double Faults | 1353 |
| 1:36:57 | Average Match Time | 1:30:11 |
| 278.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 377 |
| 61% (10742/17611) | 1st Serve % | 63% (15800/25280) |
| 67% (7196/10742) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (10406/15800) |
| 47% (3217/6869) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4350/9480) |
| 47% (914/1944) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1359/2892) |
| 43% (7459/17178) | Return Points Win % | 44% (11030/24816) |
| 56% (14/11) | Slam W/L | 48% (13/14) |
| 58% (19/14) | Masters W/L | 51% (19/18) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 65% (46/25) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (37/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (53/23) | Challenger W/L | 64% (110/62) |
| 73% (24/9) | Futures W/L | 76% (65/20) |
| 65% (157/240) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (238/379) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 62% (47/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (65/101) |
| 60% (50/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (74/141) |
| 88% (155/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (243/201) |
| 12% (155/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (243/41) |
| 25% (87/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (147/43) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
