L. Noskova
To Win
I. Swiatek
To Win
Linda Noskova vs Mayar Sherif Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L W L W
Form
W L W L W W W W W LH2H: Noskova 1 - 1 Sherif
They have played 4 sets in total, with Noskova winning 2 and Sherif winning 2. The last match between Noskova and Sherif was at the Open 6 Sens - Lyon, 01-02-2023, Second, I.hard with Linda Noskova getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Linda Noskova | 1 |
| Mayar Sherif | 1 |
Open 6 Sens - Lyon(01-02-2023)
6
3
6
2
| Noskova | Stats | Sherif |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (12-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 31 | Ranking | 50 |
| 25 | Highest Rank | 31 |
| 20 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 18 |
| 65% (159-84) | Career Total W/L | 64% (285-158) |
| $2,058,192 | Career Prize Money | $1,018,848 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Linda Noskova
Player
Mayar Sherif
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Linda Noskova
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 19 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:28:46 | Average Match Time | 1:28:46 |
| 65% (93/144) | 1st Serve % | 70% (89/127) |
| 61% (57/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (51/89) |
| 49% (25/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (21/38) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (5/16) |
| 43% (55/127) | Return Points Win % | 43% (62/144) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Bernarda Pera
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Linda Noskova
111%
(
70 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
124%
(
61 of
49)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Linda Noskova
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Linda Noskova
41%
(
23 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Linda Noskova
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jessica Pegula
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Diana Shnaider
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
16
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(8) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Mayar Sherif
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Renata Zarazua
88%
(
58 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Chloe Paquet
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Maria Timofeeva
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Caroline Werner
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Verena Meliss
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Mayar Sherif
55%
(
77 of
140)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
48%
(
67 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Joelle Steur
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Mayar Sherif
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Lulu Sun
76%
(
83 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (159/84) | Win/Loss | 64% (285/158) |
| 62% (351/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (631/378) |
| 53% (2878/2503) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5078/4182) |
| 66% (73/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (72/77) |
| 60% (38/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 74% (210/74) |
| 75% (44/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 40% (4/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 898 | Aces Total | 781 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1000 | Total Double Faults | 540 |
| 1:36:57 | Average Match Time | 1:28:24 |
| 277.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.07 |
| 61% (10795/17697) | 1st Serve % | 72% (17897/24888) |
| 67% (7233/10795) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11294/17897) |
| 47% (3233/6902) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3451/6990) |
| 47% (919/1949) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1434/3147) |
| 43% (7488/17233) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11354/25331) |
| 56% (14/11) | Slam W/L | 44% (14/18) |
| 59% (20/14) | Masters W/L | 34% (11/21) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (46/25) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (30/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (53/23) | Challenger W/L | 77% (147/43) |
| 73% (24/9) | Futures W/L | 69% (83/38) |
| 66% (158/241) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (281/436) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 62% (47/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (67/101) |
| 60% (50/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (64/128) |
| 88% (156/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (289/252) |
| 12% (156/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (289/37) |
| 25% (87/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (154/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
