Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Linda Noskova vs Mayar Sherif Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Noskova vs Sherif analysis and find out who is favored!
Linda Noskova vs Mayar Sherif Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Noskova has won 48.83% of points on his second serve, while Sherif has won 45.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Noskova, in recent form, has won 50.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sherif has won 47.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.46% and 33.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Noskova has saved 64.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sherif has saved 53.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Noskova has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 36/ 20), with Sherif winning 54.35% (W/L 25/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 43/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Sherif has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 168/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9), where as Sherif has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 82.35% of matches (W/L 14/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Noskova winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Noskova winning 2 and Sherif winning 2. The last match between Noskova and Sherif was at the Open 6 Sens - Lyon, 01-02-2023, Second, I.hard with Linda Noskova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Noskova and Sherif have played a deciding set 0 times, with Noskova winning 0 times and Sherif 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Noskova winning 0, and Sherif 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Noskova has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.63 while Sherif has played against players with an average rank of 151.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Noskova has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sherif has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Noskova has converted 41.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sherif has converted 38.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Noskova 1 - 1 Sherif
31
Rank
28
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
72
Rank
31
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
68% (134-63)
Career Total W/L
65% (242-131)
68% (15-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-5)
$1,524,725
Career Prize Money
$770,658
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Linda Noskova | Mayar Sherif |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 23 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:46 | 1:28:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (93/144) | 70% (89/127) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (57/93) | 57% (51/89) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (25/51) | 55% (21/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 31% (5/16) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (55/127) | 43% (62/144) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Linda Noskova
Player
Mayar Sherif
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Linda Noskova
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Linda Noskova | Mayar Sherif |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (15/7) | 0% (0/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (32/20) | 9% (1/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (262/243) | 37% (36/61) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 111 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:58 | 1:38:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 90.68 | 119 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1011/1654) | 71% (226/318) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (701/1011) | 59% (133/226) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (315/643) | 39% (36/92) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (67/160) | 44% (8/18) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (654/1631) | 36% (113/318) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (14/21) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (5/0) |
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
73 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Maria Timofeeva
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Camila Giorgi
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
10
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Linda Noskova
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Maria Sakkari
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
7
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Bernarda Pera
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Linda Noskova
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Mayar Sherif
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Mayar Sherif
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
115)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Mayar Sherif
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mayar Sherif
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
37
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Dolehide
Player
Mayar Sherif
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Mayar Sherif
65%
(
80 of
124)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
118
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Ylena In-Albon
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Mayar Sherif
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(11) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Julia Riera
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Mayar Sherif
76%
(
74 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
81 of
111)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
106
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Noskova Vs Sherif Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
