Linda Fruhvirtova vs Ena Shibahara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Fruhvirtova has won 37.55% of points on her second serve, while Shibahara has a stronger 47.41%. How does this impact the match outcome? A better second serve return often translates to dominance in longer rallies.
• Return Game: Fruhvirtova excels at returning second serves, with a success rate of 54.25%, compared to Shibahara’s 49.4%. Conversely, for first-serve returns, Fruhvirtova is at 34.38% against Shibahara’s 30.68%. Who has the upper hand? Fruhvirtova might be favored when the opponent is serving.
• Critical Point Performance: Under pressure, Fruhvirtova has saved 52.26% of break points; Shibahara is close behind at 51.42%. Effective break-point saves could swing the match either way.
• Match Wins: Over the past year, Fruhvirtova has won 51.85% of her matches (W/L 28/26), while Shibahara has a better record with a 61.76% win rate (W/L 42/26). Will Shibahara’s higher win percentage give her the confidence edge?
• Best Surface Performance: Both players perform well on indoor hard courts, with Shibahara having a win percentage of 67% compared to Fruhvirtova’s 59%. How critical is surface preference? It might play a significant role since indoor conditions favor both.
• Player Level: Both athletes have mostly competed at Challenger/ITF levels above $10K, with Shibahara having a slightly better win rate of 61.29% over Fruhvirtova’s 59.38%. Does experience against similar levels play a role in this match?
• Head-to-Head: Previously, Shibahara won the sole direct encounter against Fruhvirtova with a 2-1 set victory. Will history repeat itself?
• Extreme Pressure Situations: Shibahara has won the only tiebreak between them, suggesting she might handle high-pressure moments better than Fruhvirtova.
• Opponents’ Rankings: Recently, Fruhvirtova has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 220.56, versus Shibahara’s 240.43.
• Deciding Sets: Against all players, Shibahara has a slight edge, winning 56% of deciding sets in the past year, compared to Fruhvirtova’s 50%.
• Break Points Conversion: Recently, Fruhvirtova has been more proficient at converting break points, achieving a 38.72% success rate over Shibahara’s 35.23%.

Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):

Fruhvirtova and Shibahara enter this match with strengths that could decisively impact the outcome. Fruhvirtova shows prowess in returning second serves and converting break points but struggles with second-serve effectiveness. Shibahara counters with superior second-serve performance and a solid track record in deciding sets.

Historically, Shibahara holds the upper hand having defeated Fruhvirtova in their previous encounter. Her ability to perform well under pressure, as demonstrated in tiebreaks and deciding sets, positions her as a formidable opponent once more.

Surface familiarity could play crucial roles, and both excel on indoor hard courts. However, Shibahara's overall superior win-rate over the past year and her success on this surface make her the likely winner in this match.

Conclusion: Based on the performance patterns and historical data, Shibahara is the probable winner of the upcoming match against Fruhvirtova.