Prediction of Libor Pimek vs Charles Honey Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Pimek vs C. Honey

Libor Pimek

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

319

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Charles Honey

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

319

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Pimek 1 - 0 Honey

They have played 3 sets in total, with Libor Pimek winning 2 and Charles Honey winning 1. The last match between Libor Pimek and Charles Honey was at the Livingston, 15-08-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Libor Pimek getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pimek	1
Honey	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Livingston(08-15-88)

Stats

Libor Pimek

Charles Honey

L. Pimek vs C. Honey H2H Profile

L. Pimek	Stats	C. Honey
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.32% (158-144)	Career Total W/L	30.77% (4-9)
1	Hard	0
3	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Pimek vs C. Honey Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Libor Pimek has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Charles Honey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Libor Pimek, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Charles Honey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Libor Pimek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Charles Honey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Libor Pimek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Charles Honey winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Libor Pimek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 99/77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Charles Honey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/6).
Player level: In the last year, Libor Pimek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Charles Honey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Libor Pimek winning 1 times and Charles Honey being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Libor Pimek winning 2 and Charles Honey winning 1.
The last match between Libor Pimek and Charles Honey was at the Livingston, 15-08-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Libor Pimek getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Libor Pimek has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Charles Honey has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Libor Pimek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Charles Honey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Libor Pimek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Charles Honey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Libor Pimek vs Charles Honey Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Pimek vs C. Honey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Pimek	Stats	C. Honey
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	12
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Pimek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Marino - 27-07-1992
R1 Mikael TillstromM. Tillstrom	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Stockholm - 21-10-1991
R1 Aaron KricksteinA. Krickstein	L	6-2 2-6 7-6(6)	Stats
Toulouse - 30-09-1991
R1 Thomas EnqvistT. Enqvist	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Prague - 05-08-1991
R2 Arnaud BoetschA. Boetsch	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R1 Pedro RebolledoP. Rebolledo	W	6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

C. Honey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg CH - 23-10-1989
R3 Paul HandP. Hand	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R4 Paul KoscielskiP. Koscielski	L	4-6 6-3 7-5	Stats
Australian Open - 16-01-1989
R1 Nicklas KroonN. Kroon	L	6-0 7-5 6-4	Stats
San Francisco - 26-09-1988
R3 Tim WilkisonT. Wilkison	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Livingston - 15-08-1988
R3 Libor PimekL. Pimek	L	6-2 3-6 6-4	Stats

View All

L. Pimek vs C. Honey Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Pimek	Stats	C. Honey
52.32% (158/144)	YTD Win/Loss	30.77% (4/9)
49.86% (364/366)	Sets Win/Loss	36.36% (12/21)
49.66% (3323/3368)	Games Win/Loss	44.55% (143/178)
51.22% (42/40)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (3/6)
56.25% (99/77)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
40.48% (17/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
390.17	Average Opponent Rank	435.08
26.32% (5/14)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
42.11% (8/11)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (2/2)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
54.15% (111/94)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/4)
58.18% (32/23)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (4/4)
54% (149/274)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	33% (4/12)
35% (9/26)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
62% (56/90)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (2/6)
87% (148/129)	1st Set Won, Won Match	60% (5/3)
12% (148/18)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	40% (5/2)
19% (154/30)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (8/1)