Liam Draxl vs Darwin Blanch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Oct at 04:30 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Draxl vs D. Blanch

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Draxl 1 - 0 Blanch
They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Draxl winning 2 and Darwin Blanch winning 0. The last match between Liam Draxl and Darwin Blanch was at the Sioux Falls Challenger, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Draxl getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Draxl | 1 |
| Blanch | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Sioux Falls Challenger(10-21-25)
L. Draxl vs D. Blanch H2H Profile
L. Draxl vs D. Blanch Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Liam Draxl has excelled slightly more, winning 45.10% of second serve points compared to Darwin Blanch's 42.53%. Does this give Draxl an edge? The numbers suggest it might.
- Return Game Stats: Draxl again has the upper hand, securing 47.32% of return points on second serves, while Blanch captures 45.75%. On first serve return points, Draxl leads with 25.87% against Blanch's 23.64%.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Surprisingly, Blanch performs better in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 54.69% compared to Draxl's 50.83%. Will this resilience help him during critical match moments?
- Performance Overview: Draxl edges out Blanch slightly in matches won over the past year, with 68.48% to Blanch's 66.67%.
- Best Surface: Both players excel on different surfaces; Blanch shines on Hard courts, while Draxl excels on Indoor Hard surfaces. This might influence who has the upper hand depending on the court surface.
- Player Level: Blanch frequents lower-tier tournaments (Futures/Satellites/ITF), but has a high win rate of 76.19%. Draxl plays at a slightly higher competitive level (Challengers/ITF > $10K), winning 73.13% of his matches.
- Opponent Quality: Draxl typically faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 313.03 compared to Blanch's 367.97.
- Deciding Set Performance: Should the match go to a deciding set, Draxl has a stronger record, winning 64% of these sets, whereas Blanch wins 53%.
Editorial Prediction (October 20, 2025, UTC):
In second serve performance, Liam Draxl maintains a slight advantage over Darwin Blanch, suggesting better service resilience and point construction.
Draxl also leads in return game effectiveness, displaying a consistent ability to challenge his opponent's serves, especially in the first and second returns.
Despite Blanch being more efficient at saving breakpoints under pressure, Draxl's slightly superior match-winning rate indicates consistent performance across the board.
Considering their preferred surfaces, if the match unfolds on an indoor hard court, Draxl's strengths align perfectly, potentially lending him an advantage over Blanch.
Factoring in the opponent's quality and the deciding set statistics, the data suggests that Liam Draxl is more likely to come out on top in this match-up.
Liam Draxl vs Darwin Blanch Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Draxl vs D. Blanch H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:30:31 | Average Match Time | 1:30:31 |
| 56% (38/68) | 1st Serve % | 57% (40/70) |
| 71% (27/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27/40) |
| 63% (19/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 41% (29/70) | Return Points Win % | 32% (22/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Draxl Recent Matches Played
D. Blanch Recent Matches Played

L. Draxl vs D. Blanch Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.63% (212/116) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.59% (75/53) |
| 62.55% (461/276) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.95% (168/127) |
| 55.16% (3800/3089) | Games Win/Loss | 52.48% (1437/1301) |
| 65.06% (108/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.29% (54/30) |
| 61.18% (52/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.78% (20/21) |
| 68.42% (52/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1104 | Aces Total | 409 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 936 | Total Double Faults | 275 |
| 1:41:4 | Average Match Time | 1:22:41 |
| 417.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 216.35 |
| 65% (13418/20537) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4568/7353) |
| 70% (9335/13418) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3111/4568) |
| 50% (3553/7119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1400/2785) |
| 47% (1048/2239) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (306/720) |
| 42% (8726/20708) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2935/7457) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Masters W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 61.54% (88/55) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (6/15) |
| 72.73% (120/45) | Futures W/L | 67.01% (65/32) |
| 65% (206/316) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (73/125) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (49/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (18/29) |
| 56% (49/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 90% (213/191) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (74/63) |
| 9% (213/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (74/11) |
| 18% (114/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (54/12) |