Liam Draxl vs Adrian Andreev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent times, the prowess demonstrated by Andreev and Draxl in their second serve performance has been noteworthy. Over the course of the last six months, Andreev has triumphed in 50.27% of points on their second serve, while Draxl has achieved a success rate of 49%. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistical achievement and the accuracy of match predictions. Taking into account the return game statistics in their recent form, Andreev has exhibited an impressive ability to claim victory in 48.51% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Draxl has asserted dominance by winning 58.01% in the same category. As for the first serve returns, Andreev has displayed a success rate of 33.26%, whereas Draxl has secured a commendable 37.18%. These return game stats offer valuable insights that aid in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup. An analysis of the players' ability to withstand pressure reveals intriguing results. Andreev has managed to save 56.35% of breakpoints in their recent performances, whereas Draxl has showcased resilience by saving 61.6%. This particular statistic carries significant weight in the realm of in-game betting predictions. When evaluating the overall performance of Andreev and Draxl, we learn that Andreev has emerged victorious in 53.03% of matches played within the last year, boasting a win/loss record of 35/31. Draxl, on the other hand, has showcased a remarkable win rate of 69.05% with a win/loss record of 58/26. These statistics provide a comprehensive overview that aids in predicting the head-to-head outcome. Examining the players' proficiency on different surfaces, Andreev's strongest surface in terms of career win percentage is Clay, where they have triumphed in 61% of matches (W/L 125/80). Conversely, on Grass, Andreev has struggled to claim victory, with a win percentage of 0% (W/L 0/2). As for Draxl, their most successful surface is Indoor Hard, with a career win percentage of 70% (W/L 44/19). In contrast, Draxl's weakest surface is Clay, where they have won 60% of matches (W/L 42/28). These surface-specific statistics shed light on the players' strengths and weaknesses. Taking a closer look at the players' levels, we observe that Andreev has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/26) in the past year. Similarly, Draxl has participated in most of their matches in Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a 61.54% success rate (W/L 32/20). When comparing the players' statistics to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the level at which they have been competing. Considering the quality of their opponents, Andreev has faced players with an average rank of 287.32 over the past 12 months, offering a glimpse into the level of competition they have confronted. In comparison, Draxl has encountered opponents with an average rank of 334.43. These opponent quality statistics provide valuable context when evaluating the players' performances. In meetings that escalate to a deciding set, Andreev has displayed a commendable ability, triumphing in 55% of such sets within the last 12 months. Conversely, Draxl has achieved an impressive victory rate of 67% in all matches played on tour. These deciding set performances serve as crucial indicators for those interested in live predictions and betting. While past player performance remains a vital aspect in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to examine current event statistics to gauge the form of players in the ongoing event. Consequently, it is advisable to refer to the section below to access up-to-date information on player performance in the current event. Furthermore, it is worth considering that some players excel more in specific events, thus necessitating a consideration of this factor when predicting the outcome. A telling statistic in the realm of in-game live betting tips is the break point conversion rate. In recent form, Andreev has showcased an ability to convert 45.18% of breakpoint opportunities, while Draxl has impressed with a conversion rate of 48.82% when seizing the chance to break their opponents' serve. This statistic offers valuable insight to bettors during crucial moments in the game. For those intrigued by the models used to predict tennis matches, the provided article serves as an excellent starting point. However, potential readers should be aware that the contents of the article cater primarily to statistics enthusiasts.