Liam Broady vs Phillip Jordan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 12:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs P. Jordan

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Jordan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 2 and Phillip Jordan winning 1. The last match between Liam Broady and Phillip Jordan was at the M25 Glasgow, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 1 |
| Jordan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Glasgow(10-29-25)
L. Broady vs P. Jordan H2H Profile
L. Broady vs P. Jordan Match Preview:
- In recent months, Liam Broady has shown slightly better second serve effectiveness, winning 42.76% of points compared to Phillip Jordan's 41.48%.
- Phillip Jordan has excelled in return games, capturing 45.21% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Broady captures 40.39%.
- For first serve returns, Jordan again leads with 30.57% compared to Broady's 24.68% success rate.
- When saving breakpoints, both players perform closely, with Jordan at 48.99% and Broady at 48.86%.
- Considering win rates over the last year, Broady is superior, winning 73.33% of matches, whilst Jordan has secured 58.33%.
- On hard surfaces, both players have performed similarly, with a win rate of 63% each, but Broady struggles more on grass.
- Both players frequently compete in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, but Broady records a higher win percentage of 76.47% against Jordan's 58.33%.
- Broady generally faces lesser-ranked opponents with an average rank of 393.28 compared to Jordan's significantly tougher opponents averaging at rank 43.03.
- Broady seems more adept in clinching deciding sets, winning 55% of them, while Jordan only manages to achieve 38%.
- Event-specific performance could also provide insights once the tournament progresses, so these should be monitored for any additional advantages.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Liam Broady exhibits a slight edge when it comes to second serve points and overall match win rate over the past year. His substantial experience in lower-tier tournaments has translated into a high overall win percentage.
On the other hand, Phillip Jordan shines in the return game, both on first and second serves, showing better adaptability in play. His experience against higher-ranked opponents could be a significant advantage.
Broady's tendency to handle pressure situations better, such as winning deciding sets, leans in his favor if the match gets tight.
Considering all these factors, Liam Broady appears to be the more likely winner in the upcoming match, although Phillip Jordan's strengths, particularly his return game, cannot be dismissed.
Liam Broady vs Phillip Jordan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs P. Jordan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:42:10 | Average Match Time | 2:42:10 |
| 71% (77/109) | 1st Serve % | 56% (45/80) |
| 65% (50/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (29/45) |
| 47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
| 40% (32/80) | Return Points Win % | 40% (44/109) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
P. Jordan Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs P. Jordan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.56% (530/375) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.29% (57/36) |
| 57.07% (1194/898) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.14% (128/78) |
| 53.00% (10422/9244) | Games Win/Loss | 55.38% (1075/866) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.33% (38/22) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 60.62% (137/89) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (16/10) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2463 | Aces Total | 113 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1573 | Total Double Faults | 118 |
| 1:14:21 | Average Match Time | 1:9:36 |
| 514.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 216 |
| 63% (30163/47979) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2392/3722) |
| 68% (20574/30163) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1507/2392) |
| 52% (9306/17809) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (707/1330) |
| 43% (2041/4736) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (196/483) |
| 40% (18996/47605) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1778/4132) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.50% (227/182) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.66% (226/108) | Futures W/L | 61.29% (57/36) |
| 59% (519/877) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (57/92) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (137/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (17/25) |
| 52% (141/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 87% (520/454) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (59/54) |
| 13% (520/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (59/5) |
| 20% (383/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (34/3) |