Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Li Tu vs Steven De Waard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tu vs Waard analysis and find out who is favored!
Li Tu vs Steven De Waard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tu has won 52.27% of points on his second serve, while Waard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tu, in recent form, has won 51.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Waard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tu has saved 67.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Waard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tu has won 56.34% of matches played (W/L 40/ 31), with Waard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 108/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 24/ 18). Waard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 22/ 22), where as Waard has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tu winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tu winning 2 and Waard winning 1. The last match between Tu and Waard was at the Australia F3, 03-03-2014, First, Grass with Li Tu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tu and Waard have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tu winning 1 times and Waard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tu winning 0, and Waard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tu has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.32 while Waard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tu has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Waard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tu has converted 37.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Waard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tu 1 - 0 Waard
193
Rank
186
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
707
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
63% (159-92)
Career Total W/L
51% (66-64)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$98,510
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Li Tu | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Li Tu | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (247/208) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:20 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (850/1300) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (615/850) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (239/450) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (49/128) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (520/1354) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 90% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Andre Ilagan
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Makoto Ochi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
51 of
62)
12
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F | 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Steven De Waard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Ruben Mccormack
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
James Frawley
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Steven De Waard
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Tu Vs Waard Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Li Tu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
