Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kerkhove vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kerkhove has won 46.38% of points on his second serve, while Inglis has won 48.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kerkhove, in recent form, has won 55.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 53.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.57% and 40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kerkhove has saved 53.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 56.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kerkhove has won 46.97% of matches played (W/L 31/ 35), with Inglis winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kerkhove has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 189/ 115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 25/ 28). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kerkhove has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.28% of matches (W/L 28/ 30), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kerkhove winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kerkhove winning 4 and Inglis winning 1. The last match between Kerkhove and Inglis was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2021, Q2 round, Grass with Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kerkhove and Inglis have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kerkhove winning 1 times and Inglis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Kerkhove winning 1, and Inglis 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kerkhove has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.8 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 289.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kerkhove has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kerkhove has converted 45.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 47.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kerkhove 2 - 0 Inglis
287
Rank
135
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
2
Grass0
305
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
57% (508-386)
Career Total W/L
59% (242-171)
35% (7-13)
YTD W/L
65% (11-6)
$509,214
Career Prize Money
$423,460
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 31 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:30 | 1:47:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (98/159) | 65% (100/153) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (78/98) | 61% (61/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (30/61) | 57% (30/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (62/153) | 32% (51/159) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(0) 6-7(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Maddison Inglis
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
7
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (7/13) | 65% (11/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (18/29) | 65% (26/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (215/240) | 57% (207/157) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:12 | 1:43:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 342.15 | 234.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (981/1473) | 63% (676/1066) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (584/981) | 67% (454/676) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (232/492) | 50% (196/390) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (72/149) | 46% (67/146) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (610/1452) | 46% (550/1202) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 31% (5/11) | 69% (9/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (7/20) | 65% (11/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 29% (7/2) |
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nigina Abduraimova
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
101
Total Points Won
78
|
6-0 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Irina Maria Bara
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
83%
(
72 of
87)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Martina Colmegna
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
88%
(
85 of
97)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Federica Di Sarra
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
52 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arianne Hartono
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kerkhove Vs Inglis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maddison Inglis
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
