Leonie Schuknecht vs Lan Mi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Sep at 11:06 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Schuknecht vs L. Mi

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schuknecht 1 - 0 Mi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Leonie Schuknecht winning 2 and Lan Mi winning 0. The last match between Leonie Schuknecht and Lan Mi was at the W15 Monastir, 11-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Leonie Schuknecht getting the victory 6-2 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schuknecht | 1 |
| Mi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Monastir(09-11-25)
L. Schuknecht vs L. Mi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.54% (8-5) | Career Total W/L | 58.06% (36-26) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Schuknecht vs L. Mi Match Preview:
- On second serve performance in recent months, Mi leads slightly with 35.02% of points won, compared to Schuknecht's 33.73%.
- Regarding second serve return points, Mi is marginally ahead with 49.59%, while Schuknecht is close behind at 49.33%.
- For first serve returns, Mi wins 39.27% of points, significantly outperforming Schuknecht's 28.07%.
- Mi has proven more resilient under pressure, saving 46.42% of breakpoints compared to Schuknecht's 30.3%.
- While Mi has a decent match win rate of 58.06% over the past year, Schuknecht has a higher success rate of 71.43% but with fewer matches.
- Both players excel on hard surfaces, with Schuknecht slightly better at 71% compared to Mi's 66% win rate.
- Mi has more experience and a higher win rate of 68.42% in $10K tournaments compared to Schuknecht's 83.33%, though Schuknecht has faced stronger average opponents ranked 222.14 against Mi's 421.97.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Mi's 44% success rate gives them a distinct advantage over Schuknecht, who has not won any in recent times.
- Mi converts 51.43% of breakpoints, slightly lower than Schuknecht's 57.14%, indicating different strengths in capitalizing on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (September 11, 2025, UTC):
In examining the players' second serve performance, Mi has a slight edge, though the difference is minimal. However, Mi's superior first serve return suggests a significant advantage in returning ability, which is often critical in match outcomes.
Schuknecht has a better overall win rate over the past year and excels on hard surfaces, the likely surface for the match. Yet, Mi's experience at a similar tournament level and under pressure situations could play a crucial role.
While Mi's record in deciding sets further strengthens their position, Schuknecht's capability to convert breakpoints at a higher percentage could be pivotal in crucial moments.
Considering these factors, while Schuknecht's recent form is impressive, Mi's resilience under pressure and superior return stats point to them being the more likely winner in this upcoming contest.
Leonie Schuknecht vs Lan Mi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Schuknecht vs L. Mi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:8:29 | Average Match Time | 2:8:29 |
| 55% (39/71) | 1st Serve % | 80% (69/86) |
| 64% (25/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (33/69) |
| 44% (14/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 35% (6/17) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (4/4) |
| 55% (47/86) | Return Points Win % | 45% (32/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Schuknecht Recent Matches Played
L. Mi Recent Matches Played

L. Schuknecht vs L. Mi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.54% (8/5) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.06% (36/26) |
| 61.54% (16/10) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.86% (81/59) |
| 55.36% (124/100) | Games Win/Loss | 53.67% (665/574) |
| 70.00% (7/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.40% (35/22) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 10 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 49 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1:8:9 | Average Match Time | 1:37:57 |
| 365.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.68 |
| 59% (303/512) | 1st Serve % | 83% (2929/3509) |
| 67% (204/303) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (1520/2929) |
| 47% (98/209) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (259/580) |
| 45% (35/77) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (253/500) |
| 48% (260/543) | Return Points Win % | 49% (1802/3672) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 53.13% (17/15) |
| 72.73% (8/3) | Futures W/L | 63.33% (19/11) |
| 62% (8/13) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 100% (8/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (36/32) |
| 0% (8/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (36/4) |
| 0% (5/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (26/4) |