Prediction of Learner Tien [69th] vs Marcos Giron [45th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L W W L
Form
W L W W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Tien 0 - 0 Giron
| Tien | Stats | Giron |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (13-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 69 | Ranking | 45 |
| 66 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 19 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 9 |
| 73% (118-43) | Career Total W/L | 57% (390-290) |
| $431,935 | Career Prize Money | $3,137,420 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Learner Tien vs Marcos Giron Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tien 0 - 0 Giron
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tien has won 41.44% of points on their second serve, while Giron has won 43.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tien, in recent form, has won 48.51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Giron has won 41.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.95% and 26.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tien has saved 54.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Giron has saved 58.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tien has won 79.12% of matches played (W/L 72/ 19), with Giron winning 53.57% (W/L 30/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tien has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 92/ 29), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Giron has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 72/ 49), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 32/ 44).
- Player level: In the last year, Tien has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 81.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 7), where as Giron has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tien has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.87 while Giron has played against players with an average rank of 99.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tien has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Giron has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tien has converted 34.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Giron has converted 29.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Learner Tien vs Marcos Giron Best Odds For The Match
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Marcos Giron Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Marcos Giron
64%
(
78 of
121)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
126)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Marcos Giron
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Denis Shapovalov
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Marcos Giron
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
12
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Marcos Giron
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Alexei Popyrin
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
44%
(
38 of
86)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Casper Ruud
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Marcos Giron
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Tien vs Giron?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Tien Vs Giron is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73% (118/43) | Win/Loss | 57% (390/290) |
| 65% (258/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (924/732) |
| 55% (2050/1647) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8412/7750) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 470 | Aces Total | 2840 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 462 | Total Double Faults | 1349 |
| 1:41:39 | Average Match Time | 1:29:6 |
| 173.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 161.18 |
| 63% (7296/11605) | 1st Serve % | 62% (27318/44361) |
| 67% (4916/7296) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (19624/27318) |
| 51% (2219/4309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8705/17042) |
| 47% (596/1263) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1646/4221) |
| 43% (4905/11540) | Return Points Win % | 38% (17364/45691) |
| 75% (110/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (373/637) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (14/38) |
| 62% (39/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (146/282) |
| 75% (39/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (121/245) |
| 95% (102/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (393/327) |
| 5% (102/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (393/64) |
| 36% (59/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (287/61) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
