Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Learner Tien vs Iliyan Radulov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tien vs Radulov analysis and find out who is favored!
Learner Tien vs Iliyan Radulov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tien has won 53.73% of points on his second serve, while Radulov has won 52.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tien, in recent form, has won 55.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radulov has won 54.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.81% and 35.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tien has saved 68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radulov has saved 53.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tien has won 77.5% of matches played (W/L 31/ 9), with Radulov winning 56.41% (W/L 22/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tien has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Radulov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Tien has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4), where as Radulov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tien has played against opponents with an average rank of 111.5 while Radulov has played against players with an average rank of 235.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tien has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radulov has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tien has converted 50.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radulov has converted 41.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tien 0 - 0 Radulov
432
Rank
421
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
827
Rank
827
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
67% (46-23)
Career Total W/L
51% (24-23)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Learner Tien | Iliyan Radulov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 50% (20/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (87/66) | 51% (196/187) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 17% (1/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 67% (8/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:19 | 1:38:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 104.43 | 181.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (301/493) | 63% (687/1085) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (200/301) | 59% (404/687) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (104/192) | 53% (209/398) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (28/49) | 42% (52/125) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (207/471) | 43% (481/1117) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 56% (9/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
William Grant
Player
Learner Tien
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Learner Tien
56%
(
59 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
115)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Marco Trungelliti
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Learner Tien
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Robert Cash
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Iliyan Radulov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Iliyan Radulov
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Yaroslav Demin
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
51%
(
68 of
134)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
63 of
134)
128
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
Player
Iliyan Radulov
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
1
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Diego Fernandez Flores
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Iliyan Radulov
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Iliyan Radulov
51%
(
52 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
113)
2
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
3
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Luka Talan Lopatic
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-1 10-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tien Vs Radulov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
