Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lea Boskovic vs Merel Hoedt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Boskovic vs Hoedt analysis and find out who is favored!
Lea Boskovic vs Merel Hoedt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Boskovic 1 - 0 Hoedt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Boskovic has won 46.67% of points on their second serve, while Hoedt has won 41.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Boskovic, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hoedt has won 57.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.38% and 43.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Boskovic has saved 56.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoedt has saved 52.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Boskovic has won 61.04% of matches played (W/L 47/ 30), with Hoedt winning 60.29% (W/L 41/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Boskovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 26/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 105/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Boskovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 46/ 28), where as Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Boskovic winning 1 times and Hoedt being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Boskovic winning 2 and Hoedt winning 0. The last match between Boskovic and Hoedt was at the W15 Sharm El Sheikh, 18-11-2020, First, Hard with Lea Boskovic getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Boskovic and Hoedt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Boskovic winning 0 times and Hoedt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Boskovic winning 0, and Hoedt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Boskovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.09 while Hoedt has played against players with an average rank of 185.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Boskovic has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoedt has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Boskovic has converted 45.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoedt has converted 51.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
204
Rank
204
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
522
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
61% (214-139)
Career Total W/L
55% (162-133)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
57% (16-12)
$41,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lea Boskovic | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (57/77) | 58% (29/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (36/57) | 52% (15/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (8/20) | 29% (6/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 13% (2/16) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (29/50) | 43% (33/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Lea Boskovic
Player
Merel Hoedt
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lea Boskovic | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 57% (16/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (27/27) | 60% (37/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (254/256) | 54% (311/261) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 59% (10/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 179 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:59 | 1:52:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.63 | 250.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1147/1661) | 66% (1186/1799) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (717/1147) | 62% (730/1186) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (239/514) | 41% (252/613) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (84/185) | 52% (140/271) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (695/1644) | 49% (943/1930) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (11/10) | 56% (9/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 8% (12/1) |
Lea Boskovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Lea Boskovic
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Ziva Falkner
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Lea Boskovic
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Lea Boskovic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Lea Boskovic
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Anna Siskova
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Lea Boskovic
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lea Boskovic
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anna Klasen
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Boskovic Vs Hoedt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
