Lea Boskovic vs Alicia Herrero Linana Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 12:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Boskovic vs A. Herrero Linana

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Boskovic 1 - 0 Linana
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lea Boskovic winning 2 and Alicia Herrero Linana winning 0. The last match between Lea Boskovic and Alicia Herrero Linana was at the W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Lea Boskovic getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Boskovic | 1 |
| Linana | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen(07-02-25)
L. Boskovic vs A. H. Linana H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $41,000 | Career Prize Money | $5,130 |
| 58.90% (258-180) | Career Total W/L | 53.92% (158-135) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 66.67% (2-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
L. Boskovic vs A. H. Linana Match Preview:
- Linana has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 39.21% of points compared to Boskovic's 38.04%. What does this indicate? It suggests a marginal advantage in sustaining her serve under pressure.
- In return games, Linana outperforms Boskovic by securing 51.01% of second serve points, versus Boskovic's 49.57%. How about first serve returns? Linana again shows superiority with 38.64% compared to Boskovic's 34.03%.
- Regarding saving breakpoints, Boskovic excels slightly, saving 53.81% whereas Linana saves 48.09%. Is this critical? Yes, as breakpoint opportunities can swing match momentum.
- Analyzing their overall win rates, Linana emerges stronger, having won 64.06% of her matches last year against Boskovic's 50% win rate.
- Examining surface preferences, Linana performs best on clay surfaces with a 56% win rate, while Boskovic favors hard courts, boasting a 63% win rate.
- Both players frequent lower-tier events, but Linana has a better win rate of 64.06% in these tournaments compared to Boskovic's 47.06%.
- The quality of opponents faced differs, with Linana's average opponent ranking at 378.78, while Boskovic faces higher-ranked opponents at an average of 269.82.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Linana has a 50% success rate, slightly better than Boskovic's 44%.
- Linana exhibits better breakpoint conversion at 39.76%, compared to Boskovic's 36.8%, which could be pivotal in match-critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the statistical performance of Linana and Boskovic, several key indicators favor Linana as the probable victor. Her superior second serve points, robust return game, and overall match-winning percentage provide a compelling edge.
Furthermore, Linana's capability to thrive on clay courts, combined with her higher breakpoint conversion rate, underscores her potential to exploit Boskovic's vulnerabilities effectively.
Despite Boskovic's stronger breakpoint-saving ability and experience against higher-ranked opponents, Linana's consistency across various competitive metrics makes her the favorite to win this upcoming match.
Lea Boskovic vs Alicia Herrero Linana Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Boskovic vs A. H. Linana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:57:30 | Average Match Time | 1:57:30 |
| 70% (50/71) | 1st Serve % | 79% (45/57) |
| 56% (28/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (2/12) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 61% (35/57) | Return Points Win % | 46% (33/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Boskovic Recent Matches Played
A. H. Linana Recent Matches Played

L. Boskovic vs A. H. Linana Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.90% (258/180) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.92% (158/135) |
| 56.80% (568/432) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.18% (343/302) |
| 52.95% (4844/4305) | Games Win/Loss | 52.55% (3006/2714) |
| 61.22% (30/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.77% (33/32) |
| 58.78% (174/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.41% (123/99) |
| 59.09% (52/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 340 | Aces Total | 95 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 852 | Total Double Faults | 469 |
| 1:40:12 | Average Match Time | 1:3:35 |
| 477.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.03 |
| 73% (20931/28855) | 1st Serve % | 69% (8077/11641) |
| 59% (12304/20931) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4485/8077) |
| 45% (3568/7924) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1621/3564) |
| 49% (1875/3822) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (803/1608) |
| 47% (13631/28935) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5652/11683) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70.00% (7/3) | Main Tour W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 56.80% (192/146) | Challenger W/L | 54.14% (72/61) |
| 71.83% (51/20) | Futures W/L | 53.55% (83/72) |
| 59% (253/429) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (155/288) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (46/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (24/53) |
| 56% (75/133) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (31/60) |
| 87% (240/208) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (150/140) |
| 12% (240/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (150/9) |
| 24% (198/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (143/17) |