Lawrence Bataljin vs Matas Vasiliauskas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Lawrence Bataljin has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, winning 42.34% of points compared to Matas Vasiliauskas's 40.96%. Could this advantage influence the match outcome?
• When returning, Bataljin also leads with 47.89% of opponent's second serve points won, versus Vasiliauskas's 45.64%. This might give him an upper hand in gaining crucial points.
• Bataljin has a slight advantage returning first serves, with a 32.29% success rate compared to Vasiliauskas's 29.49%.
• Under pressure, Bataljin saves 52.32% of breakpoints, marginally outpacing Vasiliauskas who saves 50.28%.
• Is overall performance a decisive factor? In the last year, Vasiliauskas reports a higher win rate of 47.27%, while Bataljin stands at 27.66%.
• Bataljin showcases a stronger performance on hard courts, which is his best surface, suggesting he may perform well if match conditions align.
• Vasiliauskas thrives on clay, noted by his 45% win rate, but struggles on indoor hard courts with no victories in two attempts.
• Match level is crucial: Vasiliauskas's 48.15% win rate in lower-tier tournaments outstrips Bataljin's 30.23% at the same level.
• Examining opponent quality, Bataljin has faced slightly higher-ranked players (average rank 250.04) compared to Vasiliauskas (262.09).
• Is the deciding set Bataljin's weakness? While Vasiliauskas wins 69% of deciding sets, Bataljin's 31% may pose a challenge if the match goes long.
• For breakpoint conversion, Vasiliauskas holds a small edge with a 42.11% conversion rate against Bataljin's 38.76%.

Editorial Prediction (December 16, 2025, UTC):

As we evaluate the upcoming tennis match between Lawrence Bataljin and Matas Vasiliauskas, several key statistics emerge, painting a comprehensive picture of each player's strengths and potential weaknesses.

Bataljin's slightly superior performance in both second serve effectiveness and return games might provide him with the needed leverage to secure points. His ability to save breakpoints marginally better than Vasiliauskas could also be crucial under pressure.

However, Vasiliauskas enters the contest with a more consistent track record over the past year, demonstrated by his higher win percentage and success in deciding sets. Additionally, his efficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities surpasses that of Bataljin.

Considering these insights, while the match is likely to be competitive, Matas Vasiliauskas appears to be the likely winner, leveraging his recent higher performance consistency and ability to perform well under decisive situations.