Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Laura Siegemund vs Lea Boskovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siegemund vs Boskovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Laura Siegemund vs Lea Boskovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siegemund has won 49.62% of points on his second serve, while Boskovic has won 47.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siegemund, in recent form, has won 58.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Boskovic has won 54.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.6% and 38.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siegemund has saved 53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boskovic has saved 57.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siegemund has won 68.09% of matches played (W/L 32/ 15), with Boskovic winning 62.86% (W/L 44/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 334/ 177), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 125/ 120). Boskovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 26/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 16/ 6), where as Boskovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.77% of matches (W/L 44/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Siegemund winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Siegemund winning 2 and Boskovic winning 0. The last match between Siegemund and Boskovic was at the Bad Saulgau, 01-08-2018, First, Clay with Laura Siegemund getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siegemund and Boskovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Siegemund winning 0 times and Boskovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Siegemund winning 1, and Boskovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siegemund has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.13 while Boskovic has played against players with an average rank of 339.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siegemund has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boskovic has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siegemund has converted 50.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boskovic has converted 49.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Siegemund 1 - 0 Boskovic
83
Rank
27
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
216
Rank
210
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
60% (511-343)
Career Total W/L
61% (211-135)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$2,461,296
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Lea Boskovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (52/78) | 77% (60/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (36/52) | 52% (31/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 33% (6/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (41/78) | 42% (33/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 6-1 |
Stats 
Laura Siegemund
Player
Lea Boskovic
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Lea Boskovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (31/23) | 53% (20/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (275/232) | 51% (189/180) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 14 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:51 | 1:51:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 156.1 | 275.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (1229/1624) | 67% (821/1220) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (703/1229) | 64% (526/821) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (196/395) | 47% (189/399) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (117/232) | 46% (60/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (817/1698) | 42% (488/1169) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 53% (9/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 20% (10/2) |
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
83%
(
60 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
87 of
138)
1st Serve %
80%
(
85 of
106)
0
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
6
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
29%
(
15 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
51%
(
70 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Francesca Jones
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Laura Siegemund
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
84%
(
64 of
76)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Aleksandra Krunic
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
57 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lea Boskovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Lea Boskovic
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lea Boskovic
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Lea Boskovic
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Lea Boskovic
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Carolina Kuhl
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Martyna Kubka
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Lea Boskovic
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Siegemund Vs Boskovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Laura Siegemund
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
