Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Laura Siegemund vs Kiki Bertens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siegemund vs Bertens analysis and find out who is favored!
Laura Siegemund vs Kiki Bertens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siegemund has won 50.44% of points on his second serve, while Bertens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siegemund, in recent form, has won 58.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bertens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siegemund has saved 54.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bertens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siegemund has won 68.75% of matches played (W/L 33/ 15), with Bertens winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 337/ 178), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 125/ 120). Bertens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 219/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 20/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 16/ 6), where as Bertens has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Siegemund winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Siegemund winning 2 and Bertens winning 0. The last match between Siegemund and Bertens was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 19-01-2016, First, Hard with Laura Siegemund getting the victory 1100036707.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siegemund and Bertens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Siegemund winning 0 times and Bertens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Siegemund winning 0, and Bertens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siegemund has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.54 while Bertens has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siegemund has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bertens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siegemund has converted 51.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bertens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Siegemund 1 - 0 Bertens
86
Rank
27
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
4
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (514-344)
Career Total W/L
62% (436-264)
64% (16-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,498,621
Career Prize Money
$7,205,236
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Kiki Bertens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 84% (58/69) | 53% (40/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (35/58) | 65% (26/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (7/11) | 47% (17/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Laura Siegemund
Player
Kiki Bertens
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Kiki Bertens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (16/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (37/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (316/272) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:55 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 170.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (1448/1906) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (823/1448) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (231/458) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (134/260) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (945/1960) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (16/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
82%
(
72 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
77 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatrice Ricci
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
83%
(
60 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
87 of
138)
1st Serve %
80%
(
85 of
106)
0
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
6
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
29%
(
15 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
51%
(
70 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kiki Bertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Kiki Bertens
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kiki Bertens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Kiki Bertens
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Kiki Bertens
40%
(
33 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
40 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Kiki Bertens
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiki Bertens
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kiki Bertens
Player
Xinyu Wang
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Kiki Bertens
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Kiki Bertens
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Kiki Bertens
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Siegemund Vs Bertens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Laura Siegemund
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
