Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 11:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Djere vs T. Paris

SRB
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Djere 0 - 1 Paris
They have played 2 sets in total, with Laslo Djere winning 0 and Tom Paris winning 2. The last match between Tom Paris and Laslo Djere was at the Lyon Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Djere | 0 |
| Paris | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Lyon Challenger(11-12-25)
L. Djere vs T. Paris H2H Profile
L. Djere vs T. Paris Match Preview:
- Laslo Djere has a slightly better second serve performance in recent form, winning 47.15% of points, compared to Tom Paris' 46.38%. Does this give Djere an edge? Marginally, but only slightly.
- Tom Paris shows a stronger return game, winning 46.64% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Djere's 44.61%.
- For first serve returns, the players are closely matched: Djere at 23.88% and Paris at 24.05%.
- Under pressure, Djere saves 52.83% of breakpoints, slightly more than Paris' 51.22%.
- Overall, in the past year, Paris has a superior match win ratio at 63.64% compared to Djere’s 55.56%.
- Clay is Djere's preferred surface, with a 66% win rate, while Paris excels on Hard courts, also with a 66% win rate.
- Djere predominantly competes on the Main tour with a 61.54% win rate, whereas Paris plays mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments, having a 55.81% win rate.
- Djere faces tougher competition, with opponents having an average rank of 110.44, whereas the players Paris faces average a rank of 458.48.
- In deciding sets, Paris has a significant edge, winning 76% compared to Djere’s 44% over the past 12 months.
- When it comes to breakpoint conversion, Paris is slightly more effective, converting 29.35% compared to Djere's 27.71%.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
As we examine the upcoming match between Laslo Djere and Tom Paris, several key statistics provide insights into likely outcomes. Djere has a marginally better performance with his second serve, though Paris excels in return games, especially against the second serve where he holds an advantage.
While Djere has the ability to save breakpoints at a slightly higher percentage, Paris has the overall stronger win record in the past year. Notably, Paris also performs exceedingly well in deciding sets, which could be a pivotal factor if the match goes the distance.
Examining playing surfaces, Djere is at his best on Clay, but Paris thrives on Hard, indicating potential strength depending on the surface of this upcoming event. Moreover, Djere frequently faces stronger competition due to playing mainly on the Main tour, which could imply higher endurance against tougher-ranked players.
Considering all factors, including the ability to perform under pressure and on crucial points, Tom Paris seems to have a slight edge for this matchup. Thus, based on the analysis, Tom Paris appears more likely to secure the win in the forthcoming encounter.
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Djere vs T. Paris H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 14 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:45:28 | Average Match Time | 1:45:28 |
| 56% (40/71) | 1st Serve % | 54% (44/82) |
| 75% (30/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (37/44) |
| 65% (20/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 30% (25/82) | Return Points Win % | 30% (21/71) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Djere Recent Matches Played
T. Paris Recent Matches Played

L. Djere vs T. Paris Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.16% (431/310) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.36% (108/68) |
| 55.49% (1000/802) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.66% (237/167) |
| 51.72% (9071/8468) | Games Win/Loss | 52.81% (2075/1854) |
| 42.97% (55/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.45% (36/19) |
| 66.32% (321/163) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.05% (20/17) |
| 45.00% (45/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.90% (52/32) |
| 34.48% (10/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 2831 | Aces Total | 916 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2140 | Total Double Faults | 445 |
| 1:30:50 | Average Match Time | 1:30:44 |
| 459.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.52 |
| 61% (28364/46873) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6489/10743) |
| 70% (19828/28364) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (4759/6489) |
| 50% (9217/18509) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2219/4254) |
| 41% (1822/4419) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (390/934) |
| 39% (18022/46740) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4037/10728) |
| 35.59% (21/38) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39.34% (24/37) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.77% (145/106) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 59.43% (126/86) | Challenger W/L | 52.94% (27/24) |
| 74.32% (110/38) | Futures W/L | 65.57% (80/42) |
| 60% (404/672) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (107/174) |
| 33% (16/49) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (148/302) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (37/61) |
| 57% (149/263) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (31/52) |
| 85% (420/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (110/94) |
| 15% (420/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (110/16) |
| 22% (321/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (66/14) |