D. Medvedev
To Win
L. Djere
To Win
Laslo Djere vs Elias Ymer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W L W
Form
L L W W W L L L W LHead To Head: Djere 0 - 0 Ymer
| Djere | Stats | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (18-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (10-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 71 | Ranking | 259 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 105 |
| 29 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 11 |
| 59% (424-296) | Career Total W/L | 55% (410-341) |
| $3,539,105 | Career Prize Money | $987,445 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Samsonova VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laslo Djere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Laslo Djere
Player
Fabio Fognini
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Laslo Djere
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Daniel Rincon
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Federico Coria
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Laslo Djere
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Francisco Comesana
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Laslo Djere
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Elias Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Elias Ymer
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Gianluca Mager
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Elias Ymer
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Elias Ymer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Dellien
Player
Elias Ymer
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Francesco Passaro
69%
(
101 of
147)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
39%
(
57 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
129
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Elias Ymer
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Elias Ymer
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
45 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
21 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (424/296) | Win/Loss | 55% (410/341) |
| 56% (980/771) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (957/845) |
| 52% (8822/8204) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (8909/8479) |
| 44% (55/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (86/101) |
| 67% (319/160) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (229/153) |
| 46% (43/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (85/76) |
| 32% (7/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (10/11) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2726 | Aces Total | 2815 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2096 | Total Double Faults | 2073 |
| 1:30:21 | Average Match Time | 1:32:11 |
| 438.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.23 |
| 60% (27334/45259) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29344/49562) |
| 70% (19097/27334) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20354/29344) |
| 50% (8906/17925) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (9867/20218) |
| 41% (1777/4304) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1964/4769) |
| 39% (17452/45101) | Return Points Win % | 39% (19142/48724) |
| 37% (21/36) | Slam W/L | 53% (38/34) |
| 39% (22/35) | Masters W/L | 37% (11/19) |
| 50% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 50% (17/17) |
| 59% (142/100) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (68/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (124/82) | Challenger W/L | 56% (218/173) |
| 74% (110/38) | Futures W/L | 74% (58/20) |
| 61% (397/653) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (392/712) |
| 34% (16/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 51% (145/287) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (118/258) |
| 58% (148/257) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (142/272) |
| 85% (412/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (395/327) |
| 15% (412/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (395/68) |
| 23% (308/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (356/81) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
