Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs Noah Rubin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Rubin analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Noah Rubin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 51.42% of points on his second serve, while Rubin has won 53.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 50.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rubin has won 51.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.39% and 34.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 61.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rubin has saved 56.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 27/ 16), with Rubin winning 54.55% (W/L 6/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Rubin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 113/ 92).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/ 6), where as Rubin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Edmund winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Edmund winning 2 and Rubin winning 1. The last match between Edmund and Rubin was at the Binghamton Challenger, 24-07-2015, Second, Hard with Kyle Edmund getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Rubin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Edmund winning 1 times and Rubin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 0, and Rubin 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 308.09 while Rubin has played against players with an average rank of 208.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rubin has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rubin has converted 46.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Edmund 1 - 0 Rubin
420
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
734
Rank
125
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
61% (332-212)
Career Total W/L
56% (215-169)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$398,175
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Noah Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:16:40 | 2:16:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (63/104) | 65% (68/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (50/63) | 76% (52/68) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (28/41) | 57% (21/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (32/105) | 25% (26/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Kyle Edmund
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
17
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
52 of
68)
68%
(
28 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
26 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Noah Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 55% (6/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) | 58% (15/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (299/256) | 54% (131/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 121 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:11 | 1:42:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.13 | 208.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1052/1793) | 65% (509/779) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (775/1052) | 65% (333/509) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (390/741) | 54% (145/270) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (65/167) | 46% (39/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (673/1795) | 41% (294/715) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 25% (4/1) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Denis Yevseyev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Andrea Picchione
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Rubin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Noah Rubin
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Noah Rubin
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Noah Rubin
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Peter Bertran
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
83)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Noah Rubin
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Vadym Ursu
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Edmund Vs Rubin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
