Kuan-Yi Lee vs Philip Hjorth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Mar at 01:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Lee vs P. Hjorth

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lee 1 - 0 Hjorth
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kuan-Yi Lee winning 2 and Philip Hjorth winning 0. The last match between Kuan-Yi Lee and Philip Hjorth was at the M15 Nishi-Tokyo, 20-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Kuan-Yi Lee getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lee | 1 |
| Hjorth | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Nishi-Tokyo(03-20-25)
K. Lee vs P. Hjorth H2H Profile
K. Lee vs P. Hjorth Match Preview:
When predicting the outcome of an upcoming tennis match between Lee and Hjorth, examining their recent performances, as well as detailed statistics, can provide crucial insights. Analyzing their second serve effectiveness over the past six months, Lee has secured 37.59% of points, slightly behind Hjorth's 38.53%. This minor difference in second serve performance could offer a slight advantage to Hjorth.
Return game statistics in recent form show that Lee has won 45.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hjorth closely follows with 45%. Furthermore, for first serve returns, Lee has achieved a success rate of 30.59%, significantly higher than Hjorth's 25.51%. These return stats are instrumental in gauging who might hold the upper hand in their head-to-head matchup.
In terms of performance under pressure, Lee has defended 47.13% of breakpoints, compared to Hjorth's 50% breakpoint save rate. This data is particularly beneficial for live betting scenarios and suggests Hjorth could have a sturdier mental edge in tight moments.
Overall match-winning percentages from the past year also reveal some differences between the two players. Lee has won 61.11% of matches (22 wins, 14 losses), while Hjorth has a win rate of 55% (33 wins, 27 losses). Despite Hjorth having played more matches, Lee shows a higher win percentage.
Analyzing performance on different surfaces, Lee finds their greatest success on clay courts, boasting a career win rate of 62% (W/L 44/27). In contrast, Hjorth excels on hard courts with a 61% win rate (W/L 41/26). Both players show vulnerabilities on indoor hard courts, with Lee at 57% (W/L 8/6) and Hjorth significantly lower at 29% (W/L 2/5).
Participation in events gives another dimension: Lee has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.29% of those matches (W/L 19/12). Hjorth, similarly, has participated mostly in these events but with a slightly lower win percentage of 55.93% (W/L 33/26). The level of events impacts the relativity of their stats.
Looking at the quality of opponents over the past year, Lee's opponents had an average rank of 294.03, whereas Hjorth faced opponents averaging a rank of 308.35. This suggests Lee might have faced relatively stronger competition.
Should the match extend to a deciding set, Lee has a stronger track record, winning 36% of such sets, compared to Hjorth's 29%. This could be an indicator of resilience in tightly contested matches. Additionally, in recent form, Lee has converted 44.05% of breakpoint opportunities, in contrast to Hjorth's 32.56% conversion rate. Such a statistic is crucial for live betting scenarios.
Based on these comprehensive statistical comparisons, Lee seems slightly favored to win the upcoming match. Their superior return game performance, greater win rate in deciding sets, and better breakpoint conversion are key factors that could sway the match in Lee's favor.
Kuan-Yi Lee vs Philip Hjorth Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Lee vs P. Hjorth H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:46:1 | Average Match Time | 1:46:1 |
| 69% (40/58) | 1st Serve % | 57% (46/81) |
| 70% (28/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (29/46) |
| 61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 46% (37/81) | Return Points Win % | 33% (19/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Lee Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 ret. | ||
QF | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
P. Hjorth Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | ||

K. Lee vs P. Hjorth Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.10% (229/152) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.78% (65/63) |
| 61.36% (513/323) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.98% (156/133) |
| 55.46% (4142/3327) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (1371/1240) |
| 60.07% (167/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.57% (41/29) |
| 61.84% (47/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.00% (22/28) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 925 | Aces Total | 131 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 688 | Total Double Faults | 251 |
| 1:20:14 | Average Match Time | 1:1:42 |
| 510.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 299.43 |
| 67% (12875/19224) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3355/5131) |
| 67% (8646/12875) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2191/3355) |
| 51% (3247/6348) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (843/1776) |
| 46% (1052/2271) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (210/501) |
| 43% (8429/19758) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2027/5099) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (21/21) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 61.49% (206/129) | Futures W/L | 51.59% (65/61) |
| 64% (220/345) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (65/125) |
| 23% (3/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (35/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (13/20) |
| 48% (42/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 28% (10/36) |
| 85% (240/205) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (80/60) |
| 12% (240/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (80/20) |
| 20% (137/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (48/5) |