Kriish Tyagi vs Agustin Salazar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 04:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Tyagi vs A. Salazar

 IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 MEX
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tyagi 1 - 0 Salazar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kriish Tyagi winning 2 and Agustin Salazar winning 0. The last match between Kriish Tyagi and Agustin Salazar was at the M25 Harlingen, 28-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Kriish Tyagi getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Tyagi | 1 | 
| Salazar | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Harlingen(10-28-25)
K. Tyagi vs A. Salazar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 58.33% (14-10) | Career Total W/L | 35.00% (7-13) | 
| 1 | Hard | 0 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
K. Tyagi vs A. Salazar Match Preview:
- Kriish Tyagi's recent second serve performance is significantly stronger, winning 49.76% of points compared to Agustin Salazar's 35.42%. Could this stat indicate Tyagi's possible dominance in serve games? It seems plausible.
- On return games, Tyagi slightly edges Salazar with 47.25% of second serve returns won, whereas Salazar's percentage is 46.67%. This suggests Tyagi may have a slight advantage in breaking serve.
- However, Salazar is more effective on first serve returns, winning 35.23% versus Tyagi's 31.98%. Does this level the playing field? It could potentially provide Salazar with an edge in rallies.
- Under pressure, Tyagi has saved 48.84% of breakpoints, outperforming Salazar's 45.00%. Such resilience might prove crucial in clutch moments.
- In terms of overall match win percentages over the last year, Tyagi leads with a 61.90% win rate, compared to Salazar's 41.18%. This historical performance points towards Tyagi as the more consistent player.
- Both players have their best win percentages on hard courts. However, Tyagi has maintained a stronger performance across surfaces with consistently better results.
- Tyagi's matches tend to involve opponents with a higher average ranking (359.24) than those faced by Salazar (78.59), indicating a potential higher level of competition faced by Salazar.
- In deciding sets, Tyagi has won 75%, while Salazar boasts a 100% success rate. Could Salazar's ability to clinch tight matches sway the outcome? It's a possibility to consider.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the key statistics and patterns, it's evident that Kriish Tyagi has demonstrated stronger performance metrics in several aspects. His superior second serve performance and advantage in saving breakpoints suggest a solid foundation in match play.
Despite Agustin Salazar's resilience in deciding sets, Tyagi's overall consistency in match wins and ability to prevail under pressure make him a formidable opponent.
Taking into account these factors, Kriish Tyagi appears as the more likely winner for the upcoming tennis match, given his well-rounded performance profile and track record.
Kriish Tyagi vs Agustin Salazar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Tyagi vs A. Salazar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 13 | Games Won | 7 | 
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 | 
| 2:1:6 | Average Match Time | 2:1:6 | 
| 68% (40/59) | 1st Serve % | 62% (42/68) | 
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (27/42) | 
| 68% (13/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (9/26) | 
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 47% (32/68) | Return Points Win % | 32% (19/59) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
K. Tyagi Recent Matches Played
A. Salazar Recent Matches Played

K. Tyagi vs A. Salazar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.33% (14/10) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.00% (7/13) | 
| 53.57% (30/26) | Sets Win/Loss | 32.56% (14/29) | 
| 49.26% (267/275) | Games Win/Loss | 44.00% (176/224) | 
| 58.33% (14/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 36.84% (7/12) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 | 
| 66 | Aces Total | 1 | 
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 | 
| 33 | Total Double Faults | 23 | 
| 1:33:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 387.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 66.8 | 
| 61% (918/1515) | 1st Serve % | 64% (229/357) | 
| 63% (575/918) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (125/229) | 
| 52% (313/597) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (51/128) | 
| 44% (56/128) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (9/28) | 
| 39% (586/1503) | Return Points Win % | 35% (125/355) | 
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 63.64% (14/8) | Futures W/L | 35.00% (7/13) | 
| 58% (14/24) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (7/20) | 
| 80% (8/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 
| 75% (6/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (3/3) | 
| 91% (11/10) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (5/5) | 
| 9% (11/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (5/0) | 
| 31% (13/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (15/2) | 












