Prediction of Kirsten Flower vs Eleanor Peters Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Flower vs E. Peters

Kirsten Flower

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Eleanor Peters

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Flower 1 - 0 Peters

They have played 2 sets in total, with Kirsten Flower winning 2 and Eleanor Peters winning 0. The last match between Kirsten Flower and Eleanor Peters was at the Rock Hill, 17-10-2011, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Kirsten Flower getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Flower	1
Peters	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Rock Hill(10-17-11)

Stats

Kirsten Flower

Eleanor Peters

K. Flower vs E. Peters H2H Profile

K. Flower	Stats	E. Peters
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.51% (20-23)	Career Total W/L	39.66% (23-35)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. Flower vs E. Peters Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirsten Flower has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eleanor Peters has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirsten Flower, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eleanor Peters has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Kirsten Flower has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eleanor Peters has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Kirsten Flower has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eleanor Peters winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Kirsten Flower has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 11/9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Eleanor Peters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 4/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/19).
Player level: In the last year, Kirsten Flower has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eleanor Peters has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kirsten Flower winning 1 times and Eleanor Peters being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kirsten Flower winning 2 and Eleanor Peters winning 0.
The last match between Kirsten Flower and Eleanor Peters was at the Rock Hill, 17-10-2011, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Kirsten Flower getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirsten Flower has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eleanor Peters has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirsten Flower has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eleanor Peters has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirsten Flower has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eleanor Peters has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kirsten Flower vs Eleanor Peters Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Flower vs E. Peters H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. Flower	Stats	E. Peters
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

K. Flower Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bron - 27-02-2012
Q1 Constance SibilleC. Sibille	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Macon - 20-02-2012
Q1 Clara FiquetC. Fiquet	W	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q3 Oceane DodinO. Dodin	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Innisbrook - 09-01-2012
Q1 Magda OkruashviliM. Okruashvili	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Bayamon - 24-10-2011
R1 Teliana PereiraT. Pereira	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

E. Peters Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bethany Beach - 11-06-2012
R1 Sanaz MarandS. Marand	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Landisville - 14-05-2012
Q2 Bridget ForsterB. Forster	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
Q1 Tanya NouryT. Noury	W	6-3 6-0	Stats
Q3 Nyla BeenkN. Beenk	L	4-6 6-1 7-5	Stats
Charlottesville - 23-04-2012
Q1 Li XiL. Xi	L	7-6(5) 7-6(10)	Stats

View All

K. Flower vs E. Peters Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. Flower	Stats	E. Peters
46.51% (20/23)	YTD Win/Loss	39.66% (23/35)
45.74% (43/51)	Sets Win/Loss	42.42% (56/76)
48.10% (393/424)	Games Win/Loss	47.61% (547/602)
55.00% (11/9)	Hard Win/Loss	36.67% (11/19)
40.00% (8/12)	Clay Win/Loss	42.11% (8/11)
33.33% (1/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.44% (4/5)
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.01
0	Total Double Faults	8
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
103.44	Average Opponent Rank	95.84
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	43% (17/40)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	47% (8/17)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	30% (7/23)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/8)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	38% (24/63)
0.00% (0/1)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
36.36% (4/7)	Challenger W/L	30.00% (9/21)
51.61% (16/15)	Futures W/L	51.85% (14/13)
45% (19/42)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (23/58)
80% (4/5)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	36% (4/11)
56% (5/9)	Deciding Set Win %	38% (6/16)
89% (18/16)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (23/19)
11% (18/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (23/4)
16% (25/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (35/4)