Kirill Kivattsev vs Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kivattsev has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.27% of points, compared to Pertusa’s 44.48%. Does this suggest a greater advantage for Kivattsev? Yes, it potentially does as second serve performance is a strong match predictor.
• In terms of return game capabilities, Kivattsev has an advantage on the opponent's second serve points, winning 46.42% versus Pertusa's 42.57%. However, Pertusa returns first serves better at 31.77% compared to Kivattsev’s 25.62%.
• When facing breakpoints, Kivattsev narrowly beats Pertusa with 55.35% saved, whereas Pertusa is at 54.79%, indicating resilience under pressure.
• Across the past year, Kivattsev has a higher match win percentage (61.33%) compared to Pertusa (57.89%). Who shows consistency over time? Kivattsev seems more reliable based on these figures.
• The players excel on different surfaces; Kivattsev performs best on grass, while Pertusa thrives on clay. Given that neither has a strong record on hard courts, the surface could neutralize both players' advantages.
• Both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. Kivattsev wins 65.15% at this level, slightly outperforming Pertusa’s 58.93%.
• Pertusa has played against more highly-ranked opponents (average rank of 166.96) compared to Kivattsev (average rank of 433.95). Could this signal Pertusa’s capability in dealing with challenging players? It suggests Pertusa is tested against tougher competition.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Pertusa is more successful, winning 61% of such sets, while Kivattsev has a 42% win rate.
• Pertusa has a better recent breakpoint conversion rate of 40.5%, compared to Kivattsev's 30.11%. Indicates who might capitalize on critical moments? Pertusa could be more decisive in converting break opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match between Kivattsev and Pertusa presents a fascinating contrast of skill sets, highlighting their unique strengths and weaknesses. Kivattsev demonstrates a solid second serve performance and superior ability in saving breakpoints. However, Pertusa counters this with a stronger return game on first serves and a remarkable ability to convert breakpoints, which might shift momentum in crucial stages.

Although Kivattsev boasts a greater overall win percentage over the past year, Pertusa’s experience against higher-ranked opponents could provide an edge in handling the competitive atmosphere. The deciding set statistics also favor Pertusa, indicating that if the match is closely contested, Pertusa may have the upper hand.

Considering these factors, including the potential pressure scenarios and the ability to convert crucial breakpoints, Pertusa seems more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.