Kimmer Coppejans vs Ray Ho Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Coppejans vs R. Ho

Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
25
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
184
C. Rank
893
97
Best Rank
715
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$337.8K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Ray Ho
TPE
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
25
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
184
C. Rank
893
97
Best Rank
715
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$337.8K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-To-Head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Ho
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and Ray Ho winning 0. The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Ray Ho was at the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger, 30-12-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Coppejans | 1 |
Ho | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(Q3) Nonthaburi 1 Challenger(12-30-24)
Kimmer Coppejans
6
7
Ray Ho
4
5
K. Coppejans vs R. Ho H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$337,830 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.57% (485-343) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (136-136) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
17 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Coppejans vs R. Ho Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimmer Coppejans has won 45.71% of points on their second serve, while Ray Ho has won 54.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimmer Coppejans, in recent form, has won 46.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ray Ho has won 45.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.74% and 19.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kimmer Coppejans has saved 55.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ray Ho has saved 67.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kimmer Coppejans has won 71.11% of matches played (W/L 64/ 26), with Ray Ho winning 23.08% (W/L 64/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kimmer Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 142/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Ray Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Kimmer Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.18% of matches (W/L 29/ 20), where as Ray Ho has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 23.08% of matches (W/L 3/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kimmer Coppejans winning 1 times and Ray Ho being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and Ray Ho winning 0. The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Ray Ho was at the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger, 30-12-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:35.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimmer Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 321.59 while Ray Ho has played against players with an average rank of 422.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimmer Coppejans has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ray Ho has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimmer Coppejans has converted 35.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ray Ho has converted 28.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kimmer Coppejans vs Ray Ho Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Coppejans vs R. Ho H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 9 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:24:35 | Avg. Match Time | 1:24:35 |
63% (37/59) | 1st Serve % | 64% (46/72) |
78% (29/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (32/46) |
73% (16/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (15/26) |
29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
35% (25/72) | Return Pts Won % | 24% (14/59) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Coppejans 51%, Ho 54%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Coppejans 54%, Ho 46%.
Break Points Saved %: Coppejans 60%, Ho 69%.
K. Coppejans Recent Matches Played
R. Ho Recent Matches Played

K. Coppejans vs R. Ho Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.57% (485/343) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (136/136) |
55.88% (1103/871) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.42% (297/304) |
52.62% (9738/8770) | Games Win/Loss | 51.88% (2928/2716) |
61.74% (142/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (103/103) |
60.60% (323/210) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.54% (31/28) |
32.08% (17/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
25.00% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.41 |
2248 | Aces Total | 1132 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
1903 | Total Double Faults | 423 |
1:29:44 | Average Match Time | 1:18:52 |
502.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.68 |
64% (32657/50777) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9126/14632) |
67% (21915/32657) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (6377/9126) |
49% (8815/18120) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2821/5506) |
43% (2458/5657) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (511/1313) |
42% (21761/51906) | Return Points Win % | 37% (5450/14642) |
52.86% (37/33) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
33.33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
27.50% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
56.60% (300/230) | Challenger W/L | 26.32% (10/28) |
75.28% (134/44) | Futures W/L | 53.85% (126/108) |
59% (477/813) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (130/265) |
45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
55% (123/223) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 34% (23/68) |
56% (174/308) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (31/62) |
84% (452/378) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (139/119) |
16% (452/73) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (139/19) |
28% (376/106) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (133/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:00 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.4
W2
1.28
01:30 AM 22/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.98
W2
1.83
12:05 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.4
W2
1.28
10:05 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.19
W2
1.68
01:30 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.1
W2
6
02:00 PM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.127
W2
5.35
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Coppejans (Orleans Challenger)
Coppejans vs RuusuvuoriCould play in The Quarterfinals
Coppejans vs GalarneauCould play in The Quarterfinals
Lajal vs CoppejansCould play in The Second
Collignon vs CoppejansCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
11:00
H2H 5-2
12:20
H2H 1-2
12:20
H2H 0-2
10:50
H2H 0-1
10:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Buenos Aires Challenger
Argentina
Columbus Challenger
United States
Las Vegas Challenger
United States
Lisbon Challenger
Portugal
Orleans Challenger
France
St. Tropez Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Budapest
Hungary
M15 Fayetteville
United States
M15 Forbach
France
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hurghada
Egypt
M15 Kayseri
Turkey
M15 Kursumlijska Banja
Serbia
M15 Melilla
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Otopeni
Romania
M25 Falun
Sweden
M25 Nevers
France
M25 Pardubice
Czech Republic
M25 Sabadell
Spain
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Setubal
Portugal
M25 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Zlatibor
Serbia