Kimmer Coppejans vs Inigo Cervantes Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Coppejans vs I. Cervantes

Kimmer Coppejans

BEL

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

235

C. Rank

898

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$337.8K

Career Money

$308.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Inigo Cervantes

ESP

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

235

C. Rank

898

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$337.8K

Career Money

$308.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 1 Cervantes

They have played 4 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and Inigo Cervantes winning 2. The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Inigo Cervantes was at the Mersin Challenger, 18-04-2015, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Coppejans	1
Cervantes	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(SF) Mersin Challenger(04-18-15)

Stats

Kimmer Coppejans

Inigo Cervantes

(R2) Scheveningen Challenger(07-11-12)

Stats

Inigo Cervantes

Kimmer Coppejans

K. Coppejans vs I. Cervantes H2H Profile

K. Coppejans	Stats	I. Cervantes
$337,830	Career Prize Money	$308,293
58.45% (491-349)	Career Total W/L	56.03% (432-339)
1	Clay	1
17	Titles	12
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. Coppejans vs I. Cervantes Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimmer Coppejans has won 45.81% of points on their second serve, while Inigo Cervantes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimmer Coppejans, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Inigo Cervantes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Kimmer Coppejans has saved 54.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inigo Cervantes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Kimmer Coppejans has won 61.33% of matches played (W/L 46/29), with Inigo Cervantes winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Kimmer Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 146/91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/9). Inigo Cervantes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 349/257), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/19).
Player level: In the last year, Kimmer Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 32/24), where as Inigo Cervantes has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kimmer Coppejans winning 1 times and Inigo Cervantes being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and Inigo Cervantes winning 2.
The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Inigo Cervantes was at the Mersin Challenger, 18-04-2015, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:44.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimmer Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.71 while Inigo Cervantes has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimmer Coppejans has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inigo Cervantes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimmer Coppejans has converted 37.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inigo Cervantes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kimmer Coppejans vs Inigo Cervantes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Coppejans vs I. Cervantes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. Coppejans	Stats	I. Cervantes
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
17	Games Won	16
2	Aces (Total)	12
10	Total Double Faults	3
1:20:44	Average Match Time	1:20:44
56% (69/123)	1st Serve %	55% (60/110)
65% (45/69)	1st Serve Win %	65% (39/60)
48% (26/54)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (25/50)
63% (5/8)	Break Pts Won %	29% (4/14)
42% (46/110)	Return Points Win %	42% (52/123)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

K. Coppejans Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Lorenzo GiustinoL. Giustino	L	7-6(5) 7-6(5)	Stats
R1 Brandon HoltB. Holt	W	6-4 3-6 7-5	Stats
Monastir Challenger - 27-10-2025
R1 Mert AlkayaM. Alkaya	L	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Brest Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 August HolmgrenA. Holmgren	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Hersonissos 5 Challenger - 06-10-2025
F Ryan PenistonR. Peniston	L	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

I. Cervantes Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Seville Challenger - 02-09-2024
Q1 Pol Martin TiffonP. Martin	L	6-4 1-6 6-3	Stats
Porto 2 Challenger - 26-08-2024
Q1 Gerard Campana LeeG. Campana	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Todi Challenger - 12-08-2024
Q3 Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiL. Emanuel	L	6-2 4-3 ret.	Stats
Q1 Giorgio RiccaG. Ricca	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Seville Challenger - 04-09-2023
R1 Roberto Carballes BaenaR. Carballes	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

K. Coppejans vs I. Cervantes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. Coppejans	Stats	I. Cervantes
58.45% (491/349)	YTD Win/Loss	56.03% (432/339)
55.69% (1116/888)	Sets Win/Loss	54.45% (1004/840)
52.54% (9878/8922)	Games Win/Loss	51.85% (9178/8524)
61.60% (146/91)	Hard Win/Loss	55.00% (66/54)
60.60% (323/210)	Clay Win/Loss	57.59% (349/257)
32.76% (19/39)	Indoor Hard W/L	35.48% (11/20)
25.00% (3/9)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.25	Aces Per Game	0.3
2291	Aces Total	2615
0.21	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
1940	Total Double Faults	1525
1:30:8	Average Match Time	1st Match
508.33	Average Opponent Rank	578.19
64% (33178/51691)	1st Serve %	52% (17476/33323)
67% (22262/33178)	1st Serve Win %	72% (12616/17476)
49% (8999/18513)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (7677/15847)
43% (2497/5743)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (1331/3106)
42% (22112/52806)	Return Points Win %	39% (12722/32470)
52.86% (37/33)	Slam W/L	34.38% (11/21)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	33.33% (6/12)
33.33% (3/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
27.50% (11/29)	Main Tour W/L	45.45% (40/48)
56.46% (306/236)	Challenger W/L	55.73% (214/170)
75.28% (134/44)	Futures W/L	64.66% (161/88)
59% (483/825)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (422/747)
45% (5/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (6/18)
55% (125/228)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (127/268)
57% (179/314)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (152/285)
84% (457/382)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (413/340)
16% (457/74)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (413/73)
28% (383/108)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (358/91)