Prediction of Kimmer Coppejans vs David Fleming Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Coppejans vs D. Fleming

Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
33
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
223
C. Rank
Ret.
97
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$337.8K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

David Fleming
CHI
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
33
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
223
C. Rank
Ret.
97
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$337.8K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Fleming
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and David Fleming winning 0. The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and David Fleming was at the Belgium F6, 30-07-2012, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Coppejans | 1 |
| Fleming | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Belgium F6(07-30-12)
Kimmer Coppejans
6
6
David Fleming
1
2
K. Coppejans vs D. Fleming H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $337,830 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.45% (491-349) | Career Total W/L | 49.43% (130-133) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Coppejans vs D. Fleming Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimmer Coppejans has won 46.26% of points on their second serve, while David Fleming has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimmer Coppejans, in recent form, has won 49.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while David Fleming has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kimmer Coppejans has saved 54.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas David Fleming has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kimmer Coppejans has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 48/30), with David Fleming winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kimmer Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 146/91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/9). David Fleming has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 126/127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Kimmer Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.63% of matches (W/L 34/25), where as David Fleming has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kimmer Coppejans winning 1 times and David Fleming being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kimmer Coppejans winning 2 and David Fleming winning 0.
- The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and David Fleming was at the Belgium F6, 30-07-2012, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimmer Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.32 while David Fleming has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimmer Coppejans has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while David Fleming has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimmer Coppejans has converted 36.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and David Fleming has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kimmer Coppejans vs David Fleming Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Coppejans vs D. Fleming H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Coppejans 51%, Fleming 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Coppejans 54%, Fleming 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Coppejans 59%, Fleming 0%.
K. Coppejans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
F | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
D. Fleming Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||

K. Coppejans vs D. Fleming Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.45% (491/349) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.43% (130/133) |
| 55.69% (1116/888) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.35% (289/285) |
| 52.54% (9878/8922) | Games Win/Loss | 50.74% (2559/2484) |
| 61.60% (146/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 60.60% (323/210) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.80% (126/127) |
| 32.76% (19/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 2291 | Aces Total | 48 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1940 | Total Double Faults | 226 |
| 1:30:8 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 219.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 394.39 |
| 64% (33178/51691) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2044/3148) |
| 67% (22262/33178) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1146/2044) |
| 49% (8999/18513) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (466/1104) |
| 43% (2497/5743) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (139/328) |
| 42% (22112/52806) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1255/3119) |
| 52.86% (37/33) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 27.50% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.46% (306/236) | Challenger W/L | 27.78% (5/13) |
| 75.28% (134/44) | Futures W/L | 51.23% (125/119) |
| 59% (483/825) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (129/259) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (125/228) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 57% (179/314) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 84% (457/382) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (138/117) |
| 16% (457/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (138/21) |
| 28% (383/108) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (124/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 11:05 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 12:05 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 01:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 1-0
20:00
H2H 0-1
12:05
H2H 0-0
15:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal