Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimberly Birrell vs Susanne Celik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Birrell vs Celik analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimberly Birrell vs Susanne Celik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Birrell has won 39.29% of points on his second serve, while Celik has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Birrell, in recent form, has won 51.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Celik has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Birrell has saved 49.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Celik has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Birrell has won 44.07% of matches played (W/L 26/ 33), with Celik winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 141/ 111), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Celik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 115/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14), where as Celik has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Birrell winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Birrell winning 2 and Celik winning 2. The last match between Birrell and Celik was at the Toowoomba, 12-10-2015, Second, Hard with Susanne Celik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Birrell and Celik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Birrell winning 0 times and Celik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Birrell winning 0, and Celik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Birrell has played against opponents with an average rank of 210.34 while Celik has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Birrell has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Celik has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Birrell has converted 45.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Celik has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Birrell 1 - 1 Celik
173
Rank
100
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
153
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
52% (181-166)
Career Total W/L
58% (203-146)
10% (1-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$446,328
Career Prize Money
$5,130
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kimberly Birrell | Susanne Celik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:30 | 1:35:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (102/148) | 63% (75/120) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (55/102) | 63% (47/75) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (23/46) | 40% (18/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 44% (8/18) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (55/120) | 47% (70/148) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Susanne Celik
Player
Kimberly Birrell
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Susanne Celik
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimberly Birrell | Susanne Celik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 10% (1/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 28% (7/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (108/145) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.49 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.6 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (531/828) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (322/531) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (116/297) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (39/86) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (314/778) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 10% (1/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Kimberly Birrell
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katy Dunne
Player
Kimberly Birrell
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
79%
(
11 of
14)
Break Points Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
55%
(
48 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
54 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Kimberly Birrell
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Kimberly Birrell
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
112)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
36%
(
43 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
121
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Kimberly Birrell
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
57 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
8
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Kimberly Birrell
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Kimberly Birrell
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Kimberly Birrell
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
7
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Susanne Celik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nefisa Berberovic
Player
Susanne Celik
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Victoria Mikhaylova
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nefisa Berberovic
Player
Susanne Celik
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Jenny Duerst
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Nastja Kolar
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Karolayne Da Rosa
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Naima Karamoko
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Susanne Celik
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Susanne Celik
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
15 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Susanne Celik
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Birrell Vs Celik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
