Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kiki Bertens vs Laura Pous-Tio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bertens vs Pous-Tio analysis and find out who is favored!
Kiki Bertens vs Laura Pous-Tio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bertens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Pous-Tio has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bertens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pous-Tio has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bertens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pous-Tio has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bertens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Pous-Tio winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bertens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 219/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 20/ 20). Pous-Tio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 292/ 164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 11% (W/L 1/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Bertens winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Bertens winning 4 and Pous-Tio winning 4. The last match between Bertens and Pous-Tio was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Fes, 28-04-2012, Final, Clay with Kiki Bertens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:19:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bertens and Pous-Tio have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bertens winning 0 times and Pous-Tio 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bertens winning 0, and Pous-Tio 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bertens has played against opponents with an average rank of while Pous-Tio has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bertens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pous-Tio has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bertens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pous-Tio has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bertens 2 - 2 Pous-Tio
Ret.
Rank
4
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
72
High
39
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
62% (436-264)
Career Total W/L
61% (373-242)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$7,205,236
Career Prize Money
$178,084
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kiki Bertens | Laura Pous-Tio |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 38 | 37 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:19:16 | 0:19:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (36/55) | 77% (44/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (24/36) | 50% (22/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (30/57) | 38% (21/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Kiki Bertens
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-0 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6(6) 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kiki Bertens | Laura Pous-Tio |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kiki Bertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Kiki Bertens
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kiki Bertens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Kiki Bertens
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Kiki Bertens
40%
(
33 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
40 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Kiki Bertens
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiki Bertens
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kiki Bertens
Player
Xinyu Wang
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Kiki Bertens
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Kiki Bertens
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Kiki Bertens
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Pous-Tio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ioana Loredana Rosca
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Martina Di Giuseppe
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Cristina Bucsa
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
102)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alize Lim
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alize Lim
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bertens Vs Pous-Tio Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
