Kevin Edengren vs Raffael Schaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How well do players perform on their second serve? In the past six months, Schaer has won 38.89% of points on the second serve, whereas Edengren hasn't won any.
• How do players fare in return games recently? Schaer has secured 50.94% of points on opponents' second serves and only 28.95% on first serve returns, while Edengren has not won any points in these categories.
• Does breakpoint saving under pressure indicate player resilience? Schaer has successfully saved 47.37% of breakpoints, signaling resilience, whereas Edengren falters with no breakpoints saved.
• Looking at the past year's overall win rate, Schaer has a slight edge with a 47.62% success rate in matches (10 wins, 11 losses), unlike Edengren's winless record (0 wins, 4 losses).
• Schaer’s best performance surface is indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Edengren favors clay, winning 36% of those matches.
• Competing mostly at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Schaer maintains a 47.62% win rate, starkly contrasting with Edengren's 0%.
• Is opponent caliber reflective of performance? In the past 12 months, Schaer’s average opponent ranked 99.86, while Edengren faced lower-ranked players at 731.25.
• When it comes to deciding sets, Schaer has clinched 40% of these tightly contested matches, in contrast to Edengren, who hasn't won any.
• What about the players’ proficiency at converting breakpoints recently? Schaer has a 35.71% conversion rate; Edengren, unfortunately, has converted none.

Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing recent performance statistics, Schaer clearly exhibits stronger gameplay fundamentals, particularly on the second serve and return points. This is critical in tightly competitive matches, giving Schaer a reliable foundation.

Schaer's ability to salvage breakpoints is critical, as it demonstrates resilience under pressure, a major differentiator over Edengren, who has yet to demonstrate this defensive capability in recent contests.

With regard to experience level and exposure to high-ranked players, Schaer's interactions with tougher competitors suggest a strategic advantage that Edengren lacks.

Factor in Schaer's superior deciding set win rate and breakpoint conversion efficiency, they stand out as the more rounded and adaptable player.

Given these insights, Schaer is the likely favorite to secure victory in this upcoming matchup.