Kenta Miyoshi vs Quinn Vandecasteele Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Nov at 10:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Miyoshi vs Q. Vandecasteele

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Miyoshi 1 - 1 Vandecasteele
They have played 4 sets in total, with Kenta Miyoshi winning 2 and Quinn Vandecasteele winning 2. The last match between Kenta Miyoshi and Quinn Vandecasteele was at the Champaign Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Kenta Miyoshi getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miyoshi | 1 |
| Vandecasteele | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Champaign Challenger(11-12-25)
(Q3) Fairfield Challenger(10-06-25)
K. Miyoshi vs Q. Vandecasteele H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.42% (59-42) | Career Total W/L | 52.78% (95-85) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Miyoshi vs Q. Vandecasteele Match Preview:
- Which player has a slight edge in second-serve performance? Quinn Vandecasteele holds a small advantage, winning 45.53% of points compared to Kenta Miyoshi's 44.14% in recent months.
- Who excels in winning points on their opponent's second serve? Kenta Miyoshi outperforms Quinn Vandecasteele, capturing 50.43% of points versus 47.28%.
- In terms of first serve returns, how do the players compare? Quinn Vandecasteele leads slightly, with a 26.87% success rate over Kenta Miyoshi's 25.77%.
- Who has been more effective under pressure in saving breakpoints? Quinn Vandecasteele has the edge, saving 58.22% compared to Miyoshi's 53.20%.
- Looking at the past year's performance, which player has a better win rate overall? Quinn Vandecasteele has a marginally better win rate of 51.56% against Miyoshi's 50.00%.
- What is each player's best surface? Miyoshi shines on clay (63% win rate), while Vandecasteele excels on grass (63%).
- Where have they mostly played? Miyoshi has participated in Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches, whereas Vandecasteele has been more successful in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments with a 52.78% win rate.
- Head-to-head, who has been superior? Quinn Vandecasteele has won their only encounter, dominating 2-0 in sets.
- Which player faces tougher competition? Vandecasteele has faced stronger opponents on average, with an opponent rank of 124.58 compared to Miyoshi's 179.63.
- In deciding sets, who performs better? Miyoshi has the advantage, winning 38% of such sets while Vandecasteele wins 33%.
- Which player converts breakpoints more efficiently? Vandecasteele is more effective, converting 34.29% of opportunities, ahead of Miyoshi's 31.97%.
Editorial Prediction (November 11, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match between Kenta Miyoshi and Quinn Vandecasteele presents an intriguing dynamic, with each player showcasing distinct strengths. Miyoshi excels in returning second serves and winning deciding sets, which could be crucial in a closely contested match.
Vandecasteele, however, demonstrates superior breakpoint saving ability and slightly better conversion rates, suggesting resilience under pressure. His slightly higher win rate and head-to-head advantage further bolster his contender status.
Considering these factors, including Vandecasteele's track record against tougher opponents and his previous direct win over Miyoshi, Vandecasteele appears to be the likely victor in this match.
Kenta Miyoshi vs Quinn Vandecasteele Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Miyoshi vs Q. Vandecasteele H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 15 | Games Won | 20 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:18:19 | Average Match Time | 1:18:19 |
| 50% (56/112) | 1st Serve % | 60% (72/120) |
| 59% (33/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (48/72) |
| 46% (26/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 31% (5/16) | Break Pts Won % | 39% (7/18) |
| 40% (48/120) | Return Points Win % | 47% (53/112) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Miyoshi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-0 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q. Vandecasteele Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||

K. Miyoshi vs Q. Vandecasteele Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.42% (59/42) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.78% (95/85) |
| 56.83% (129/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.40% (218/198) |
| 54.08% (1126/956) | Games Win/Loss | 51.63% (2063/1933) |
| 56.52% (39/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.04% (77/58) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 62.50% (15/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.63% (13/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 414 | Aces Total | 720 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 154 | Total Double Faults | 558 |
| 1:31:4 | Average Match Time | 1:22:41 |
| 348.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 386.31 |
| 59% (3289/5564) | 1st Serve % | 54% (5451/10136) |
| 70% (2292/3289) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3745/5451) |
| 49% (1124/2275) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2213/4697) |
| 40% (275/680) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (467/1100) |
| 42% (2485/5947) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4203/9994) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.67% (17/13) | Challenger W/L | 43.75% (28/36) |
| 60.00% (42/28) | Futures W/L | 58.26% (67/48) |
| 58% (57/99) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (89/174) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 29% (7/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (20/39) |
| 52% (13/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (27/60) |
| 91% (55/50) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (97/81) |
| 9% (55/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (97/16) |
| 17% (46/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (83/13) |