Kayo Nishimura vs Una Misic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Kayo Nishimura and Una Misic compare in second serve performance? Recently, Nishimura has a slight edge, winning 37.41% of their second serve points compared to Misic's 35.48%.
• What about the return game? Misic shows dominance, winning 63.89% of her opponent's second serve points, while Nishimura captures 49.64%.
• On first serve returns, Misic leads with 46.55% compared to Nishimura's 38.33%.
• When under pressure, Misic excels in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 62.50% vs. Nishimura's 42.58%.
• In overall match performance over the past year, Nishimura has a higher win rate of 65.52%, while Misic stands at an even 50%.
• Both players perform best on hard surfaces, each with a 65% win rate, yet Nishimura has played significantly more matches.
• Regarding match level, Nishimura has more experience with a 70.45% win rate in $10K ITF events, whereas Misic boasts a 100% win record albeit in fewer matches.
• Quality of opponents faced differs significantly, with Nishimura facing an average rank of 438.1, while Misic's opponents were unranked.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Nishimura is likely to prevail, having won 81% of such sets compared to Misic's 50%.
• In breakpoint opportunities, Misic has a superior conversion rate of 70% over Nishimura's 39.17%.

Editorial Prediction (December 8, 2025, UTC):

Both Kayo Nishimura and Una Misic have their strengths, with Misic excelling in return games and breakpoint conversion. Nishimura, however, has a higher overall win rate and experience against ranked players, which could prove advantageous.

Nishimura's superior experience and past performance in deciding sets suggest resilience under pressure. While Misic exhibits impressive stats in specific areas, her limited match experience and opponent strength may deter her performance.

Given these considerations, Kayo Nishimura seems favored to win this upcoming tennis match, supported by her comprehensive match experience and tactical resilience.