Karen Khachanov vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Khachanov vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Karen Khachanov vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Khachanov 1 - 1 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Khachanov has won 52.18% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 48.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Khachanov, in recent form, has won 50.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.22% and 30.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Khachanov has saved 63.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 59.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Khachanov has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 34/ 17), with Zandschulp winning 47.27% (W/L 26/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Khachanov has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 25/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 101/ 69). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Khachanov has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 7), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Khachanov winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Khachanov winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 3. The last match between Khachanov and Zandschulp was at the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai, 28-02-2023, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Khachanov and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Khachanov winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Khachanov winning 0, and Zandschulp 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Khachanov has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.33 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 178.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Khachanov has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Khachanov has converted 43.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
13
Total
1
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
5
Main
5
Minor
18
Rank
8
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
100
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
61% (399-259)
Career Total W/L
63% (332-197)
68% (19-9)
YTD W/L
43% (12-16)
$11,444,118
Career Prize Money
$2,900,825
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Khachanov VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Karen Khachanov | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 26 | 28 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 11 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:5:25 | 2:5:25 |
1st Serve % | 74% (133/179) | 63% (106/169) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (91/133) | 72% (76/106) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (22/46) | 51% (32/63) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 26% (5/19) |
Return Points W% | 36% (61/169) | 37% (66/179) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Khachanov VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Karen Khachanov
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
83 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Karen Khachanov | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 68% (19/9) | 43% (12/16) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (44/25) | 43% (27/36) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (377/330) | 48% (295/325) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 36% (4/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 50% (7/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.62 | 0.4 |
Aces Total | 216 | 120 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 31 | 87 |
Avg Match Time | 2:1:1 | 1:46:44 |
Avg Opp Rank | 125.61 | 190.79 |
1st Serve % | 64% (1391/2171) | 63% (1234/1962) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (1029/1391) | 68% (845/1234) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (407/780) | 48% (350/728) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (77/178) | 39% (68/176) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (839/2261) | 38% (751/1968) |
Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 64% (9/5) | 50% (5/5) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 70% (7/3) | 42% (5/7) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 46% (12/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 50% (7/14) |
Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 57% (4/7) |
1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 6% (16/1) |
Karen Khachanov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Karen Khachanov
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
R3 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Karen Khachanov
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Flavio Cobolli
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Karen Khachanov
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Cameron Norrie
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H |
view more