Kaitlin Quevedo vs Amarni Banks Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 03:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Quevedo vs A. Banks

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Quevedo 1 - 0 Banks
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kaitlin Quevedo winning 2 and Amarni Banks winning 0. The last match between Kaitlin Quevedo and Amarni Banks was at the W75 Glasgow, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Kaitlin Quevedo getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Quevedo | 1 |
| Banks | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Glasgow(10-30-25)
K. Quevedo vs A. Banks H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $41,500 |
| 68.65% (127-58) | Career Total W/L | 60.09% (131-87) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Quevedo vs A. Banks Match Preview:
- Second serve performance: What's the difference in recent results? Kaitlin Quevedo has a 40.94% success rate, whereas Amarni Banks slightly outperforms her with 42.80%.
- Return game strength: Quevedo has a stronger return on opponents' second serves, winning 50.08% of those points, while Banks stands at 48.42%. How about first serve returns? Quevedo again comes out on top with 35.13%, compared to Banks's 30.65%.
- Breaking under pressure: Quevedo excels slightly more in saving breakpoints, managing to save 48.47%, as opposed to Banks's 46.86%.
- Overall performance in past year: Quevedo has a stronger win record with 66.25% of her matches won versus Banks's 56.86%.
- Best surface advantage: Both players boast their highest win percentage on Hard courts, with each achieving a 74% success rate. Yet, Banks struggles more on Clay, winning 33% compared to Quevedo's 66%.
- Competition level: Quevedo has a higher win rate at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K at 67.53%, whereas Banks holds a 58.33% win rate.
- Quality of opponents faced: The opponents' average ranking faced by Quevedo is nearly identical to Banks, with a slight advantage, at 319.93 compared to 321.18.
- Deciding set capability: When matches are tightly contested, Quevedo holds the edge, winning 62% of deciding sets compared to Banks's 55%.
- Importance of current event performance is noted, though no specific current tournament data is provided.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Kaitlin Quevedo shows a slight advantage in several key areas essential for contesting competitive tennis matches. Her stronger performance in return games, overall match wins, and ability to secure deciding sets indicate a consistently competitive edge.
Both players excel on hard courts, yet Quevedo displays superior adaptability on various surfaces, especially compared to Banks's notably weaker performance on clay. Although both have similarly challenging opponents, Quevedo repeatedly demonstrates an ability to maintain composure under pressure by saving breakpoints.
Based on current statistical analysis, Kaitlin Quevedo stands as the likely winner in this upcoming match, with multiple indicators pointing toward her having a consistent edge over Amarni Banks.
Kaitlin Quevedo vs Amarni Banks Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Quevedo vs A. Banks H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:48:15 | Average Match Time | 1:48:15 |
| 70% (49/70) | 1st Serve % | 67% (56/84) |
| 63% (31/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (36/56) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 24% (5/21) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 48% (40/84) | Return Points Win % | 40% (28/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Quevedo Recent Matches Played
A. Banks Recent Matches Played

K. Quevedo vs A. Banks Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.65% (127/58) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.09% (131/87) |
| 62.91% (268/158) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.00% (295/205) |
| 55.48% (2151/1726) | Games Win/Loss | 53.44% (2456/2140) |
| 74.07% (40/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.99% (80/47) |
| 65.77% (73/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 70.00% (14/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.87% (42/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 267 | Aces Total | 673 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 424 | Total Double Faults | 616 |
| 1:44:7 | Average Match Time | 1:30:8 |
| 410.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 435.78 |
| 66% (7986/12153) | 1st Serve % | 66% (8572/13053) |
| 60% (4813/7986) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5584/8572) |
| 48% (2012/4167) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2117/4480) |
| 48% (843/1749) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (696/1480) |
| 49% (5860/12066) | Return Points Win % | 44% (5633/12900) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 63.64% (91/52) | Challenger W/L | 61.63% (106/66) |
| 89.74% (35/4) | Futures W/L | 59.46% (22/15) |
| 68% (122/180) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (129/214) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (19/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (19/31) |
| 68% (40/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (32/66) |
| 90% (115/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (133/113) |
| 10% (115/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (133/20) |
| 33% (70/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (85/18) |