Prediction of Justin Gimelstob vs Zack Fleishman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Gimelstob vs Z. Fleishman

Justin Gimelstob

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

127

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$197.9K

Career Money

$100.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Zack Fleishman

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

127

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$197.9K

Career Money

$100.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gimelstob 3 - 0 Fleishman

They have played 7 sets in total, with Justin Gimelstob winning 6 and Zack Fleishman winning 1. The last match between Justin Gimelstob and Zack Fleishman was at the USTA Illinois Challenger - Champaign, 15-11-2005, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Justin Gimelstob getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gimelstob	3
Fleishman	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R1) USTA Illinois Challenger - Champaign(11-15-05)

Stats

Justin Gimelstob

Zack Fleishman

(R2) Miller Lite Hall of Fame Tennis Championships - Newport(07-10-03)

Stats

Justin Gimelstob

Zack Fleishman

(R2) Siebel Open - San Jose(02-13-03)

Stats

Justin Gimelstob

Zack Fleishman

J. Gimelstob vs Z. Fleishman H2H Profile

J. Gimelstob	Stats	Z. Fleishman
$197,880	Career Prize Money	$100,345
51.94% (295-273)	Career Total W/L	51.99% (222-205)
1	Grass	0
2	Indoor	0
7	Titles	3
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Gimelstob vs Z. Fleishman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Justin Gimelstob has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Justin Gimelstob, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Justin Gimelstob has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zack Fleishman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Justin Gimelstob has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Zack Fleishman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Justin Gimelstob has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 57/41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 14/30). Zack Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/25).
Player level: In the last year, Justin Gimelstob has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Zack Fleishman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Justin Gimelstob winning 3 times and Zack Fleishman being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Justin Gimelstob winning 6 and Zack Fleishman winning 1.
The last match between Justin Gimelstob and Zack Fleishman was at the USTA Illinois Challenger - Champaign, 15-11-2005, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Justin Gimelstob getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Justin Gimelstob has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zack Fleishman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Justin Gimelstob has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zack Fleishman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Justin Gimelstob has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zack Fleishman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Justin Gimelstob vs Zack Fleishman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Gimelstob vs Z. Fleishman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Gimelstob	Stats	Z. Fleishman
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	1
37	Games Won	22
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Gimelstob Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
St. Petersburg Open - St. Petersburg - 22-10-2007
R1 Mikhail YouzhnyM. Youzhny	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
ATP Kremlin Cup - Moscow - 08-10-2007
R1 Philipp KohlschreiberP. Kohlschreiber	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
AIG Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo - 01-10-2007
R2 Thomas JohanssonT. Johansson	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Lukasz KubotL. Kubot	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 27-08-2007
R1 Andy RoddickA. Roddick	L	7-6(6) 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

Z. Fleishman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2011
Q1 Vincent MillotV. Millot	L	4-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Rogers Cup - Montreal - 08-08-2011
Q1 Alejandro FallaA. Falla	L	6-7(2) 6-2 6-2	Stats
Farmers Classic - Los Angeles - 25-07-2011
Q1 Sahr Timothy KpulunS. Timothy	L	6-2 3-1 ret.	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 20-06-2011
Q1 Marc GicquelM. Gicquel	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 31-08-2009
Q1 Mikhail KukushkinM. Kukushkin	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Gimelstob vs Z. Fleishman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Gimelstob	Stats	Z. Fleishman
51.94% (295/273)	YTD Win/Loss	51.99% (222/205)
51.86% (725/673)	Sets Win/Loss	50.89% (513/495)
50.70% (6839/6649)	Games Win/Loss	50.47% (4898/4807)
53.80% (177/152)	Hard Win/Loss	52.61% (151/136)
31.82% (14/30)	Clay Win/Loss	45.65% (21/25)
57.02% (65/49)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.43% (36/34)
48.15% (39/42)	Grass Win/Loss	58.33% (14/10)
0.07	Aces Per Game	0.04
475	Aces Total	209
0.04	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
234	Total Double Faults	136
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
453.55	Average Opponent Rank	486.66
56% (2771/4933)	1st Serve %	54% (1576/2919)
72% (2015/2783)	1st Serve Win %	69% (1092/1576)
47% (1018/2160)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (662/1343)
38% (126/336)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (91/214)
34% (1517/4473)	Return Points Win %	36% (998/2795)
44.62% (29/36)	Slam W/L	43.59% (17/22)
45.83% (22/26)	Masters W/L	28.57% (2/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
43.23% (99/130)	Main Tour W/L	53.16% (42/37)
64.44% (145/80)	Challenger W/L	51.36% (132/125)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	64.44% (29/16)
54% (273/506)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (214/413)
35% (20/57)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (4/8)
47% (100/215)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (81/166)
47% (89/189)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (80/149)
82% (304/248)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (216/183)
18% (304/54)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (216/32)
18% (263/47)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (210/37)