Prediction of Justin Gimelstob vs Matias Boeker Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Gimelstob vs M. Boeker

Justin Gimelstob
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
48
Age
44
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
70
Best Rank
216
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$197.9K
Career Money
$3.6K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Matias Boeker
USA
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
48
Age
44
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
70
Best Rank
216
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$197.9K
Career Money
$3.6K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Gimelstob 1 - 0 Boeker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Justin Gimelstob winning 2 and Matias Boeker winning 0. The last match between Justin Gimelstob and Matias Boeker was at the Fifth-Third Bank Tennis Championships - Lexington, 29-07-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Justin Gimelstob getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gimelstob | 1 |
| Boeker | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Fifth-Third Bank Tennis Championships - Lexington(07-29-02)
Justin Gimelstob
6
6
Matias Boeker
2
2
J. Gimelstob vs M. Boeker H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $197,880 | Career Prize Money | $3,650 |
| 51.94% (295-273) | Career Total W/L | 54.55% (66-55) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Gimelstob vs M. Boeker Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Justin Gimelstob has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Matias Boeker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Justin Gimelstob, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matias Boeker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Justin Gimelstob has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matias Boeker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Justin Gimelstob has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Matias Boeker winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Justin Gimelstob has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 57/41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 14/30). Matias Boeker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 50/37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Justin Gimelstob has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Matias Boeker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Justin Gimelstob winning 1 times and Matias Boeker being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Justin Gimelstob winning 2 and Matias Boeker winning 0.
- The last match between Justin Gimelstob and Matias Boeker was at the Fifth-Third Bank Tennis Championships - Lexington, 29-07-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Justin Gimelstob getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Justin Gimelstob has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Matias Boeker has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Justin Gimelstob has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matias Boeker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Justin Gimelstob has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matias Boeker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Justin Gimelstob vs Matias Boeker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Gimelstob vs M. Boeker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Gimelstob 0%, Boeker 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Gimelstob 0%, Boeker 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Gimelstob 0%, Boeker 0%.
J. Gimelstob Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-3 6-3 | ||
M. Boeker Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-6(7) | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-0 | ||

J. Gimelstob vs M. Boeker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.94% (295/273) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.55% (66/55) |
| 51.86% (725/673) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.35% (144/142) |
| 50.70% (6839/6649) | Games Win/Loss | 50.62% (1393/1359) |
| 53.80% (177/152) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.47% (50/37) |
| 31.82% (14/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.63% (10/9) |
| 57.02% (65/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 48.15% (39/42) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 475 | Aces Total | 19 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 234 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 453.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.73 |
| 56% (2771/4933) | 1st Serve % | 64% (238/371) |
| 72% (2015/2783) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (166/238) |
| 47% (1018/2160) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (65/147) |
| 38% (126/336) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 59% (13/22) |
| 34% (1517/4473) | Return Points Win % | 38% (133/354) |
| 44.62% (29/36) | Slam W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 45.83% (22/26) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.23% (99/130) | Main Tour W/L | 73.33% (11/4) |
| 64.44% (145/80) | Challenger W/L | 52.94% (45/40) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 54% (273/506) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (64/117) |
| 35% (20/57) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 47% (100/215) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 37% (17/46) |
| 47% (89/189) | Deciding Set Win % | 73% (29/40) |
| 82% (304/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (61/50) |
| 18% (304/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (61/11) |
| 18% (263/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (60/16) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Wed, 26 Nov, 06:30 AM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 11:30 AM
PredictionWed, 26 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionWed, 26 Nov, 06:00 AM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 11:30 AM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 02:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Karan Singh Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Sada Nahimana Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Antoine Ghibaudo Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Julia Riera Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:00
H2H 0-1
12:00
H2H 1-0
20:30
H2H 1-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
06:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola