Jurgen Zopp vs Ivan Nedelko Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L L L L W
Form
L W W L W L W L W LHead To Head: Zopp 1 - 2 Nedelko
They have played 7 sets in total, with Zopp winning 3 and Nedelko winning 4. The last match between Zopp and Nedelko was at the Sopot Challenger, 31-07-2019, Second, Clay with Jurgen Zopp getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jurgen Zopp | 1 |
| Ivan Nedelko | 2 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Ivan Nedelko
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Jurgen Zopp
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 31 | Games Won | 34 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:0:36 | Average Match Time | 1:0:36 |
| 61% (83/136) | 1st Serve % | 61% (86/142) |
| 75% (62/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (61/86) |
| 51% (27/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (27/56) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 38% (54/142) | Return Points Win % | 35% (47/136) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jurgen Zopp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karlis Ozolins
Player
Jurgen Zopp
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Jurgen Zopp
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(3) 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Jurgen Zopp
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(4) 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Jurgen Zopp
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Artem Smirnov
Player
Jurgen Zopp
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Jurgen Zopp
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Nedelko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Ivan Nedelko
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Tobia Costanzo Baragiola Mordini
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Ivan Nedelko
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
51
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Renta Tokuda
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Ivan Nedelko
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Louis Larue
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Ivan Nedelko
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Pengyu Lu
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Louis Larue
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Ivan Nedelko
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (430/285) | Win/Loss | 62% (654/407) |
| 58% (960/698) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (1414/965) |
| 53% (8326/7306) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (11686/10132) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 2080 | Aces Total | 1211 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1032 | Total Double Faults | 1250 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 610.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 541.98 |
| 61% (18271/30159) | 1st Serve % | 58% (21519/37277) |
| 71% (13027/18271) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (14220/21519) |
| 52% (6230/11888) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7889/15757) |
| 41% (1188/2926) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1996/4268) |
| 38% (11757/30638) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15951/36607) |
| 61% (413/674) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (640/1024) |
| 35% (11/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 54% (121/226) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (140/251) |
| 55% (108/197) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (171/287) |
| 90% (412/369) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (627/566) |
| 10% (412/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (627/59) |
| 20% (302/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (433/87) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
