Prediction of Jurgen Melzer vs Tim Henman Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Melzer vs T. Henman

Jurgen Melzer
AUT
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
44
Age
51
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
8
Best Rank
4
5
Total Titles
11
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.0M
Career Money
$650.4K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Tim Henman
GBR
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
44
Age
51
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
8
Best Rank
4
5
Total Titles
11
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.0M
Career Money
$650.4K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Melzer 1 - 2 Henman
They have played 9 sets in total, with Jurgen Melzer winning 3 and Tim Henman winning 6. The last match between Tim Henman and Jurgen Melzer was at the Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells, 14-03-2005, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Tim Henman getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Melzer | 1 |
| Henman | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R3) Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells(03-14-05)
Tim Henman
7
6
Jurgen Melzer
5
4
(Rubber 4) Davis Cup, World Group, QR, AUT-GBR 3-2(09-26-04)
Tim Henman
0
6
7
6
Jurgen Melzer
6
2
6
2
(R2) NASDAQ-100 Open - Miami(03-26-04)
Jurgen Melzer
7
2
7
Tim Henman
6
6
6
J. Melzer vs T. Henman H2H Profile
J. Melzer vs T. Henman Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jurgen Melzer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tim Henman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jurgen Melzer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tim Henman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jurgen Melzer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tim Henman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jurgen Melzer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tim Henman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jurgen Melzer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 118/73), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 134/128). Tim Henman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 80/34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 61/50).
- Player level: In the last year, Jurgen Melzer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tim Henman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Jurgen Melzer winning 1 times and Tim Henman being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Jurgen Melzer winning 3 and Tim Henman winning 6.
- The last match between Jurgen Melzer and Tim Henman was at the Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells, 14-03-2005, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Tim Henman getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jurgen Melzer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tim Henman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jurgen Melzer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tim Henman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jurgen Melzer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tim Henman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jurgen Melzer vs Tim Henman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Melzer vs T. Henman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 41 | Games Won | 50 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Melzer 0%, Henman 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Melzer 0%, Henman 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Melzer 0%, Henman 0%.
J. Melzer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
T. Henman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 | W | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 2-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | ||

J. Melzer vs T. Henman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.31% (504/424) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.55% (488/268) |
| 52.64% (1266/1139) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.15% (1239/787) |
| 50.71% (11860/11528) | Games Win/Loss | 53.77% (10660/9165) |
| 51.15% (134/128) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.01% (201/113) |
| 52.32% (169/154) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.95% (61/50) |
| 60.48% (150/98) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.28% (146/71) |
| 53.68% (51/44) | Grass Win/Loss | 70.18% (80/34) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 3144 | Aces Total | 586 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1648 | Total Double Faults | 364 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 534.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.32 |
| 63% (28979/46355) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5469/8929) |
| 70% (20212/28983) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3882/5463) |
| 51% (8873/17339) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1775/3460) |
| 39% (1651/4210) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (355/835) |
| 37% (17216/46317) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3464/8989) |
| 56.74% (80/61) | Slam W/L | 66.67% (98/49) |
| 42.36% (61/83) | Masters W/L | 55.98% (117/92) |
| 43.14% (22/29) | Cups W/L | 79.31% (23/6) |
| 54.74% (231/191) | Main Tour W/L | 68.45% (243/112) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 65.24% (107/57) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (414/754) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (363/572) |
| 50% (82/163) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 68% (123/180) |
| 51% (200/396) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (170/315) |
| 55% (179/323) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (129/242) |
| 79% (501/397) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (464/404) |
| 21% (501/103) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (464/60) |
| 24% (426/104) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (292/84) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:10 AM 21/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction10:30 AM 21/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 21/11/25
Prediction11:30 AM 21/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 1-0
06:05
H2H 0-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
15:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal