Prediction of Julie Sampson Hayward vs Nell Hopman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sampson Hayward vs N. Hopman

Julie Sampson Hayward

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

116

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Nell Hopman

AUS

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

116

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hayward 1 - 1 Hopman

They have played 5 sets in total, with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 3 and Nell Hopman winning 2. The last match between Julie Sampson Hayward and Nell Hopman was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 19-09-1955, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Julie Sampson Hayward getting the victory 7-5 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hayward	1
Hopman	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R4) Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-19-55)

Stats

Julie Sampson Hayward

Nell Hopman

(Robin) Perth Exho(01-30-53)

Stats

Nell Hopman

Julie Sampson Hayward

J. S. Hayward vs N. Hopman H2H Profile

J. S. Hayward	Stats	N. Hopman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.45% (83-59)	Career Total W/L	54.93% (312-256)
0	Grass	1
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. S. Hayward vs N. Hopman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nell Hopman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julie Sampson Hayward, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nell Hopman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Julie Sampson Hayward has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nell Hopman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nell Hopman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Julie Sampson Hayward has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 42/23), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Nell Hopman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 46/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 40/60).
Player level: In the last year, Julie Sampson Hayward has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nell Hopman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 1 times and Nell Hopman being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 3 and Nell Hopman winning 2.
The last match between Julie Sampson Hayward and Nell Hopman was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 19-09-1955, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Julie Sampson Hayward getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julie Sampson Hayward has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nell Hopman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nell Hopman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Julie Sampson Hayward has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nell Hopman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Julie Sampson Hayward vs Nell Hopman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. S. Hayward vs N. Hopman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. S. Hayward	Stats	N. Hopman
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
30	Games Won	28
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. S. Hayward Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Newport Beach - 20-10-1958
Helene WeillH. Weill	L	6-1 6-8 6-1	Stats
Wiesbaden - 13-05-1957
R4 Daphne SeeneyD. Seeney	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R3 Margarethe Von GerlachM. Von	W	3-7 7-5 6-0	Stats
Rome - 06-05-1957
R3 Renee SchuurmanR. Schuurman	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Florence - 01-05-1957
R4 Margaret HellyerM. Hellyer	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Hopman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berkeley - 26-09-1966
R3 Diana GaiD. Gai	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Los Angeles - 15-09-1966
R3 Ingrid BentzerI. Bentzer	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Knokke - 08-08-1966
R4 Michele KahnM. Kahn	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Hilversum - 18-07-1966
R3 Lidy VenneboerL. Venneboer	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Bastad - 03-07-1966
R4 Liv HubertL. Hubert	L	6-2 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

J. S. Hayward vs N. Hopman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. S. Hayward	Stats	N. Hopman
58.45% (83/59)	YTD Win/Loss	54.93% (312/256)
57.47% (177/131)	Sets Win/Loss	54.54% (685/571)
52.49% (1467/1328)	Games Win/Loss	52.62% (5895/5307)
53.06% (26/23)	Hard Win/Loss	54.55% (18/15)
54.55% (12/10)	Clay Win/Loss	40.00% (40/60)
64.62% (42/23)	Grass Win/Loss	57.30% (208/155)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
64.71% (11/6)	Slam W/L	50.43% (59/58)
58% (81/139)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (297/548)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (15/30)	Deciding Set Win %	43% (66/152)
91% (77/70)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (316/263)
9% (77/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (316/53)
18% (62/11)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (236/37)