Prediction of Julie Sampson Hayward vs Mary Teran De Weiss Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sampson Hayward vs M. Teran De Weiss

Julie Sampson Hayward

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

107

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mary Teran De Weiss

ARG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

107

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hayward 1 - 0 Weiss

They have played 2 sets in total, with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 2 and Mary Teran De Weiss winning 0. The last match between Julie Sampson Hayward and Mary Teran De Weiss was at the Wimbledon, 22-06-1953, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Julie Sampson Hayward getting the victory 11-9 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hayward	1
Weiss	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Wimbledon(06-22-53)

Stats

Julie Sampson Hayward

Mary Teran De Weiss

J. S. Hayward vs M. T. D. Weiss H2H Profile

J. S. Hayward	Stats	M. T. D. Weiss
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.45% (83-59)	Career Total W/L	65.88% (168-87)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. S. Hayward vs M. T. D. Weiss Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mary Teran De Weiss has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julie Sampson Hayward, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mary Teran De Weiss has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Julie Sampson Hayward has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mary Teran De Weiss has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mary Teran De Weiss winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Julie Sampson Hayward has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 42/23), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Mary Teran De Weiss has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 22/11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 39/22).
Player level: In the last year, Julie Sampson Hayward has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mary Teran De Weiss has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 1 times and Mary Teran De Weiss being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 2 and Mary Teran De Weiss winning 0.
The last match between Julie Sampson Hayward and Mary Teran De Weiss was at the Wimbledon, 22-06-1953, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Julie Sampson Hayward getting the victory 11-9 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julie Sampson Hayward has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mary Teran De Weiss has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mary Teran De Weiss has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Julie Sampson Hayward has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mary Teran De Weiss has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Julie Sampson Hayward vs Mary Teran De Weiss Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. S. Hayward vs M. T. D. Weiss H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. S. Hayward	Stats	M. T. D. Weiss
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
18	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. S. Hayward Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Newport Beach - 20-10-1958
Helene WeillH. Weill	L	6-1 6-8 6-1	Stats
Wiesbaden - 13-05-1957
R4 Daphne SeeneyD. Seeney	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R3 Margarethe Von GerlachM. Von	W	3-7 7-5 6-0	Stats
Rome - 06-05-1957
R3 Renee SchuurmanR. Schuurman	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Florence - 01-05-1957
R4 Margaret HellyerM. Hellyer	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

M. T. D. Weiss Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 22-06-1959
R2 Angela MortimerA. Mortimer	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Queens Club - 15-06-1959
R4 Anna DmitrievaA. Dmitrieva	L	W/O	Stats
R3 Janet HoppsJ. Hopps	W	W/O	Stats
Roland Garros - 19-05-1959
R2 Yola RamirezY. Ramirez	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Wimbledon - 23-06-1958
R2 Fran MarshallF. Marshall	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

J. S. Hayward vs M. T. D. Weiss Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. S. Hayward	Stats	M. T. D. Weiss
58.45% (83/59)	YTD Win/Loss	65.88% (168/87)
57.47% (177/131)	Sets Win/Loss	63.40% (343/198)
52.49% (1467/1328)	Games Win/Loss	55.75% (2764/2194)
53.06% (26/23)	Hard Win/Loss	66.67% (2/1)
54.55% (12/10)	Clay Win/Loss	66.24% (104/53)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	100.00% (1/0)
64.62% (42/23)	Grass Win/Loss	63.93% (39/22)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
64.71% (11/6)	Slam W/L	54.29% (19/16)
58% (81/139)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	66% (157/237)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
50% (15/30)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (36/63)
91% (77/70)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (162/144)
9% (77/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (162/18)
18% (62/11)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (77/14)