Prediction of Julie Sampson Hayward vs Mary Ann Eilenberger Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sampson Hayward vs M. Ann Eilenberger

Julie Sampson Hayward

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mary Ann Eilenberger

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hayward 2 - 0 Eilenberger

They have played 5 sets in total, with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 4 and Mary Ann Eilenberger winning 1. The last match between Julie Sampson Hayward and Mary Ann Eilenberger was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 11-09-1954, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Julie Sampson Hayward getting the victory 6-3 0-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hayward	2
Eilenberger	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R4) Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-11-54)

Stats

Julie Sampson Hayward

Mary Ann Eilenberger

() Los Angeles Pac Southwest Juniors(09-11-50)

Stats

Julie Sampson Hayward

Mary Ann Eilenberger

J. S. Hayward vs M. A. Eilenberger H2H Profile

J. S. Hayward	Stats	M. A. Eilenberger
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.45% (83-59)	Career Total W/L	55.56% (25-20)
2	Hard	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. S. Hayward vs M. A. Eilenberger Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mary Ann Eilenberger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julie Sampson Hayward, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mary Ann Eilenberger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Julie Sampson Hayward has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mary Ann Eilenberger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mary Ann Eilenberger winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Julie Sampson Hayward has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 42/23), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Mary Ann Eilenberger has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 8/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
Player level: In the last year, Julie Sampson Hayward has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mary Ann Eilenberger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 2 times and Mary Ann Eilenberger being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Julie Sampson Hayward winning 4 and Mary Ann Eilenberger winning 1.
The last match between Julie Sampson Hayward and Mary Ann Eilenberger was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 11-09-1954, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Julie Sampson Hayward getting the victory 6-3 0-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julie Sampson Hayward has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mary Ann Eilenberger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julie Sampson Hayward has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mary Ann Eilenberger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Julie Sampson Hayward has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mary Ann Eilenberger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Julie Sampson Hayward vs Mary Ann Eilenberger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. S. Hayward vs M. A. Eilenberger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. S. Hayward	Stats	M. A. Eilenberger
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
24	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

J. S. Hayward Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Newport Beach - 20-10-1958
Helene WeillH. Weill	L	6-1 6-8 6-1	Stats
Wiesbaden - 13-05-1957
R4 Daphne SeeneyD. Seeney	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R3 Margarethe Von GerlachM. Von	W	3-7 7-5 6-0	Stats
Rome - 06-05-1957
R3 Renee SchuurmanR. Schuurman	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Florence - 01-05-1957
R4 Margaret HellyerM. Hellyer	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

M. A. Eilenberger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
La Jolla - 12-07-1956
F Dodo CheneyD. Cheney	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
SF Marilyn JosephM. Joseph	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
La Jolla - 11-07-1955
Corky OlerichC. Olerich	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
SF Sue MucciaS. Muccia	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
F Marjorie LauderbachM. Lauderbach	W	W/O	Stats

View All

J. S. Hayward vs M. A. Eilenberger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. S. Hayward	Stats	M. A. Eilenberger
58.45% (83/59)	YTD Win/Loss	55.56% (25/20)
57.47% (177/131)	Sets Win/Loss	52.69% (49/44)
52.49% (1467/1328)	Games Win/Loss	52.05% (431/397)
53.06% (26/23)	Hard Win/Loss	52.17% (12/11)
54.55% (12/10)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
64.62% (42/23)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (4/3)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
64.71% (11/6)	Slam W/L	60.00% (3/2)
58% (81/139)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (22/41)
50% (15/30)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (6/10)
91% (77/70)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (24/21)
9% (77/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	8% (24/2)
18% (62/11)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	6% (18/1)