Julie Pastikova vs Aspen Schuman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Pastikova vs A. Schuman

Julie Pastikova
CZE
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
17
Age
18
-
Height
-
579
C. Rank
0
579
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Aspen Schuman
USA
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
17
Age
18
-
Height
-
579
C. Rank
0
579
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Pastikova 0 - 0 Schuman
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pastikova | 0 |
| Schuman | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
J. Pastikova vs A. Schuman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.54% (32-20) | Career Total W/L | 65.45% (36-19) |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Pastikova vs A. Schuman Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julie Pastikova has won 36.46% of points on their second serve, while Aspen Schuman has won 34.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julie Pastikova, in recent form, has won 50.89% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aspen Schuman has won 45.20%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.67% and 35.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Julie Pastikova has saved 46.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aspen Schuman has saved 40.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Julie Pastikova has won 65.79% of matches played (W/L 25/13), with Aspen Schuman winning 64.71% (W/L 11/6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Julie Pastikova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 18/13). Aspen Schuman has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 34/18).
- Player level: In the last year, Julie Pastikova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/12), where as Aspen Schuman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.00% of matches (W/L 7/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julie Pastikova has played against opponents with an average rank of 406.11 while Aspen Schuman has played against players with an average rank of 307.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julie Pastikova has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aspen Schuman has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Julie Pastikova has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aspen Schuman has converted 40.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Julie Pastikova vs Aspen Schuman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pastikova 47%, Schuman 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pastikova 60%, Schuman 60%.
Break Points Saved %: Pastikova 51%, Schuman 57%.
J. Pastikova Recent Matches Played
A. Schuman Recent Matches Played

J. Pastikova vs A. Schuman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.54% (32/20) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.45% (36/19) |
| 59.50% (72/49) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.10% (77/47) |
| 54.72% (591/489) | Games Win/Loss | 54.34% (607/510) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.38% (34/18) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (14/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 72 | Aces Total | 36 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 160 | Total Double Faults | 133 |
| 1:34:15 | Average Match Time | 1:32:4 |
| 379.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.85 |
| 61% (1950/3207) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2006/3162) |
| 60% (1171/1950) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1196/2006) |
| 47% (589/1257) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (536/1156) |
| 51% (223/440) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (215/412) |
| 49% (1527/3147) | Return Points Win % | 48% (1499/3119) |
| 60.87% (28/18) | Challenger W/L | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Futures W/L | 71.05% (27/11) |
| 62% (32/52) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (36/55) |
| 20% (1/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 71% (5/7) |
| 53% (9/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 83% (30/25) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (36/33) |
| 17% (30/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (36/3) |
| 32% (22/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (19/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:10 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.35
W2
1.51
08:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.27
W2
3.34
01:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.666
W2
2.05
03:00 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.22
W2
1.57
05:00 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.2
W2
1.58
06:05 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia