Julian Ocleppo vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ocleppo vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Ocleppo vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ocleppo has won 56.1% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ocleppo, in recent form, has won 42.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 52.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.49% and 25.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ocleppo has saved 72.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ocleppo has won 68.18% of matches played (W/L 30/ 14), with Ilkel winning 39.13% (W/L 18/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ocleppo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 61/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ocleppo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.77% of matches (W/L 21/ 5), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 12/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ocleppo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ocleppo winning 2 and Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Ocleppo and Ilkel was at the Mestre Challenger, 25-05-2017, Second, Clay with Julian Ocleppo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ocleppo and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ocleppo winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ocleppo winning 1, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ocleppo has played against opponents with an average rank of 282 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 251.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ocleppo has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ocleppo has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ocleppo 1 - 0 Ilkel
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
450
Rank
309
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
54% (182-157)
Career Total W/L
57% (399-307)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$7,255
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Julian Ocleppo | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:8 | 1:34:8 |
1st Serve % | 69% (45/65) | 44% (35/79) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (30/45) | 71% (25/35) |
2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 41% (18/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 75% (3/4) |
Return Points W% | 46% (36/79) | 37% (24/65) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(6) |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julian Ocleppo | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (14/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (136/160) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.53 |
Aces Total | 0 | 76 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:25:17 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 194.87 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (510/882) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (363/510) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (170/372) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (27/62) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (318/859) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Julian Ocleppo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Alexis Gautier
Player
Julian Ocleppo
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Laurent Lokoli
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Matej Dodig
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Julian Ocleppo
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Christoph Negritu
Player
Julian Ocleppo
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Julian Ocleppo
68%
(
75 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Federico Iannaccone
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more