Julia Khramtsova vs Soha Sadiq Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Soha Sadiq has a slight advantage in recent second serve points, winning 36.25%, compared to Julia Khramtsova's 32.82%.
• Can Julia Khramtsova's superior return stats make a difference? She has won 54.67% of opponent’s second serve points, versus Soha Sadiq’s 50.17%.
• Julia also stands out in returning first serves, securing 35.11% of these points, while Soha manages 30.73%.
• Under pressure, Sadiq excels by saving 56.20% of breakpoints, compared to Khramtsova’s 47.14%.
• Over the past year, Khramtsova’s match win rate is significantly higher at 63.16%, while Soha’s stands at 30.00%.
• With regard to surface proficiency, Sadiq performs best on Grass (50% win rate), and Khramtsova thrives on Hard courts (50% win rate).
• Considering the level of play, Khramtsova has been more successful on the Futures/ITF $10K circuit, winning 63.16% of her matches, compared to Sadiq's 27.27%.
• Julia has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 137.53, versus Sadiq’s 344.4 average rank.
• In deciding sets, Julia shows perfect performance, winning 100% of them, while Soha only manages 25% success.
• It's critical to analyze current event statistics to see any in-form player signs as they can significantly influence match predictions.

Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):

In their upcoming match, both players demonstrate varied strengths. While Soha Sadiq shows solid performance under pressure and reasonable second serve stats, Julia Khramtsova excels in both offensive and defensive aspects, especially in her strong return game and consistent winning record over the last year.

Julia ranks highly against generally tougher competition and boasts a flawless record in deciding sets, giving her a clear edge. In contrast, Soha’s weaknesses, such as her low win rate and struggles against stronger opponents, are hard to overlook.

Considering these factors, Julia Khramtsova emerges as the likely candidate to win this match, based on her overall stronger performance metrics and head-to-head statistics.